DKH
The Bergeron of HF
- Feb 27, 2002
- 74,225
- 51,999
My geography isn’t great - isn’t Tampa in Florida? Or Is It Georgia ? It’s in the South regardlessFlorida has fans?
My geography isn’t great - isn’t Tampa in Florida? Or Is It Georgia ? It’s in the South regardlessFlorida has fans?
My geography isn’t great - isn’t Tampa in Florida? Or Is It Georgia ? It’s in the South regardless
just. wow.Seems more to me a bunch of people interested in hockey rooting for a guy to fail
Which makes it weird to me that Backes has not been used that way- his speed isn't that big of a detriment there, he has a big body, can muck and grind in the corners and on the wall. It seems like a natural thing to me. It would certainly help to increase his value to the team with that contract if he's going to be a 4 liner.
I must be missing something in the Backes suckage.
I Power watched game 4 and Backes was one of the best players on the ice
Where can I get the stats for this - he had two great scoring chances bunch of good hits, breakups
Seems more to me a bunch of people interested in hockey rooting for a guy to fail
I’m worried about some of you guys slipping in hockey knowledge and I would hate to see this place openly laughed at by Vegas and Florida based fans
People hate his age & contract and thus want him gone for the unknown Replacement Player X that is sure to be so much better
I want him back if he decides he's healthy enough (w/r/t concussions) to play. IMO he is still a valuable player for the Bruins. FWIW.
We shouldn't blame the player for signing the contract he was offered.
At least the Backes talk gives Krejci a peaceful summer as he gets ready for likely his final 1200 days as a Bruins
2007 seems like yesterday
15 years in one place will be quite an accomplishment
Wasn't it Jon Koncak, famously overpaid backup center for the Atlanta Hawks that said, when criticized about his contract, "what was I going to do? Not sign it?" The terms is now not looking so good for Backes- he is definitely not the player he was in St. Louis, even right up to free agency. He's a valuable guy, a player I've always liked, and has something to offer the team in whatever role he is suited to do.
Unless he can improve his skating....drop him to the 4th line
The NHL has sped up considerably since he signed the deal.
Unless he can improve his skating....drop him to the 4th line
The NHL has sped up considerably since he signed the deal.
Here, have an article about bothIt's HF, Backes talk will get old fast and then it will be time to start in on Krejci again.
Here, have an article about both
The thing is that the NHL was trending towards speed and skill BEFORE he signed that deal. Neely and Sweeney even said the year prior that they wanted the team to be speedier and play uptempo...then they go and sign David Backes, a fine player but not someone who fit that mold. Truly bewildering how they convinced themselves that was a good idea.
Yeah, they make more combined than Patrice and Marchy. Wow. Thanks for posting- it's behind the paywall, though I am guessing the skills coach is Kim Brandvold?
People hate his age & contract and thus want him gone for the unknown Replacement Player X that is sure to be so much better
I want him back if he decides he's healthy enough (w/r/t concussions) to play. IMO he is still a valuable player for the Bruins. FWIW.
We shouldn't blame the player for signing the contract he was offered.
People hate his age & contract and thus want him gone for the unknown Replacement Player X that is sure to be so much better
I want him back if he decides he's healthy enough (w/r/t concussions) to play. IMO he is still a valuable player for the Bruins. FWIW.
We shouldn't blame the player for signing the contract he was offered.
David Backes has a lean and hungry look for the upcoming NHL season - The Boston Globe
His head clear, his weight down, David Backes is eager for training camp to open in a couple of weeks, with his eye set on increasing his playing time and expanding his profile in the Bruins’ offense.
Losing 10 pounds has a way of liberating even a 12-year NHL veteran, one with 858 career games under his now-tightened belt.
“It’s a little different feel, and it takes some getting used to,” said Backes, who has slimmed down to roughly 210 pounds, a playing weight he hasn’t maintained since turning pro out of college in 2005.
“I’m a little leaner because the game is faster and I am trying to keep up with a lot of kids. Now it’s get on the ice, keep up, and be productive and be a good member of our team.”
“Not that my style is going to change a ton,” he said, “but if I am able to get to spots quicker . . .
“I’ve played with a 220-pound frame for 8-10 years in the league, and now it’s going to be a little lighter and a little leaner.
“It’s my attempt to adapt to what changes have gone on in the league. It might just swing back the other way and be a heavier, harder league. But it’s certainly more skillful and quick, and that’s just the realization I had to make.”
Sounds like a guy who is healthy and motivated to show people he can still play at a high level.David Backes has a lean and hungry look for the upcoming NHL season - The Boston Globe
His head clear, his weight down, David Backes is eager for training camp to open in a couple of weeks, with his eye set on increasing his playing time and expanding his profile in the Bruins’ offense.
Losing 10 pounds has a way of liberating even a 12-year NHL veteran, one with 858 career games under his now-tightened belt.
“It’s a little different feel, and it takes some getting used to,” said Backes, who has slimmed down to roughly 210 pounds, a playing weight he hasn’t maintained since turning pro out of college in 2005.
“I’m a little leaner because the game is faster and I am trying to keep up with a lot of kids. Now it’s get on the ice, keep up, and be productive and be a good member of our team.”
“Not that my style is going to change a ton,” he said, “but if I am able to get to spots quicker . . .
“I’ve played with a 220-pound frame for 8-10 years in the league, and now it’s going to be a little lighter and a little leaner.
“It’s my attempt to adapt to what changes have gone on in the league. It might just swing back the other way and be a heavier, harder league. But it’s certainly more skillful and quick, and that’s just the realization I had to make.”
I liked this part at the end tooDavid Backes has a lean and hungry look for the upcoming NHL season - The Boston Globe
His head clear, his weight down, David Backes is eager for training camp to open in a couple of weeks, with his eye set on increasing his playing time and expanding his profile in the Bruins’ offense.
Losing 10 pounds has a way of liberating even a 12-year NHL veteran, one with 858 career games under his now-tightened belt.
“It’s a little different feel, and it takes some getting used to,” said Backes, who has slimmed down to roughly 210 pounds, a playing weight he hasn’t maintained since turning pro out of college in 2005.
“I’m a little leaner because the game is faster and I am trying to keep up with a lot of kids. Now it’s get on the ice, keep up, and be productive and be a good member of our team.”
“Not that my style is going to change a ton,” he said, “but if I am able to get to spots quicker . . .
“I’ve played with a 220-pound frame for 8-10 years in the league, and now it’s going to be a little lighter and a little leaner.
“It’s my attempt to adapt to what changes have gone on in the league. It might just swing back the other way and be a heavier, harder league. But it’s certainly more skillful and quick, and that’s just the realization I had to make.”
Perfect. This is what we all wanted. Rooting for him
I don’t see that st all.they got greedy and wanted to keep Bruins physical identity in tact (replace Lucic)
they 1st tried to do this with Rinaldo....we all remember how that turned out. A physical player with zero discipline. No leadership.
Sweeney seems like he tried to make it all better by signing Backes