Saw both of these in the theaters as well.
I didn't like the new SW either, in fact I can only really remember one thing from it and it's the thing about it that I find most grating. The whole rebel=good/righteous and anyone they're fighting is bad news is just beat to DEATH in this one. I get it, how about writing an interesting script now? The characters also go to great lengths to be obtuse at times and it just made for a very long film to endure.
With Bladerunner I was underwhelmed in a different way. It was visually stunning for sure, cool imagery throughout and Ana de Armas is exceedingly easy on the eyes. I did not dislike the film but I was kinda meh over the story itself. Like after it was over I didn't regret sitting through it, I just kind of wondered what the point of the long film was because despite the awesome imagery, I didn't feel like I sat through an engaging story. I'll have to watch it again and see if it strikes me more on the 2nd viewing.
Honestly the last thing I enjoyed seeing in the theater was Thor: Ragnarok. It was just an excuse to get out of the house but we both loved the sense of humor in it, even more so than GOTG (1 and 2). I thought the comedic aspect was a huge strength because I found the first two Thor films to be rather lifeless and I'll never sit through them again. I think this is the angle they take with all the superhero type stuff now since those films pretty much make up the entire action movie market these days. Make it bombastic, eye popping, etc...but most of all, writers try to keep it light and funny so the audience is always in on the joke.