Value of: Claude Giroux to a contender

BrindamoursNose

Registered User
Oct 14, 2008
20,148
14,269
Blanket statement if people are thinking Giroux is a "decent" addition to a playoff team...

Giroux is still a total freak. Best yet underrated forward this past decade. And he's still bringing the heat. God forbid you put him with another offensive wizard... fireworks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daeavorn

MorgantiDrinksBlood

Registered User
Dec 26, 2011
2,947
3,082
Tokyo, Japan
Blanket statement if people are thinking Giroux is a "decent" addition to a playoff team...

Giroux is still a total freak. Best yet underrated forward this past decade. And he's still bringing the heat. God forbid you put him with another offensive wizard... fireworks.

I agree even watching him this year, dudes still really, really good. Definitely the type of piece that can push a contender over the top. He's going to flourish when he plays with other high-end talent on some other team. The Flyers have been an absolute abomination this year, unbearable to even watch, Giroux is one of the few bright spots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ironmanrulez

1865

Alpha Couturier
Feb 28, 2005
16,849
5,610
Chester, UK
G isn't finished this year either, that's the worst thing. We'd be seeing him all over the league playing for better teams for years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ironmanrulez

TFHockey

The CEO of 7-8-0
May 16, 2014
7,061
4,456
Edmonton
I suppose if Edmonton moved RNH down to 3C and Giroux onto either McDavid's or Draisaitl's line that'd be something to see. However even with 50% retention the Oilers are so cap tight they can't really chase a winger down.
 

Bounces R Way

Registered User
Nov 18, 2013
34,493
54,774
Weegartown
Been a fan of G for a long time. Would love him on the Flames. Impossible to do it without sending Monahan back but I wouldn't have any problem putting a 1st and a A prospect on the table with that. Can he play RW? Know he has mostly played LW, C but seems intelligent enough to handle opposite wing duties well.

Gaudreau - Lindholm - Giroux/Tkachuk
Tkachuk/Giroux - Backlund - Mangiapane

Would be a nasty top 6.
 

Volica

Papa Shango
May 15, 2012
21,456
11,121
He can (he's outstanding at faceoffs), but he's a better LW at this point in his career.

Yeah; the big thing for Calgary is having another centre.

Like, if he could play centre:

Mangiapane - Giroux - Coleman

would be one helluva second line.
 

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
Sponsor
May 8, 2011
37,681
74,762
Philadelphia, Pa
Been a fan of G for a long time. Would love him on the Flames. Impossible to do it without sending Monahan back but I wouldn't have any problem putting a 1st and a A prospect on the table with that. Can he play RW? Know he has mostly played LW, C but seems intelligent enough to handle opposite wing duties well.

Gaudreau - Lindholm - Giroux/Tkachuk
Tkachuk/Giroux - Backlund - Mangiapane

Would be a nasty top 6.

He started in the NHL as a RW and played there a bit last year. I'm sure he'd be fine, just likely not as good as LW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ironmanrulez

BrindamoursNose

Registered User
Oct 14, 2008
20,148
14,269
Yeah; the big thing for Calgary is having another centre.

Like, if he could play centre:

Mangiapane - Giroux - Coleman

would be one helluva second line.

Well, he can do it if you need him to. Again, he's outstanding at faceoffs - he's 2nd in the NHL in FOW% behind Bergeron (min. 200 faceoffs attempted) and he's always been good defensively.

Again, he's a better winger, but he can play C well still.
 

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
Sponsor
May 8, 2011
37,681
74,762
Philadelphia, Pa
Yeah; the big thing for Calgary is having another centre.

Like, if he could play centre:

Mangiapane - Giroux - Coleman

would be one helluva second line.

I'd say he can't carry a line of scrubs as a C ( as he did early in his Flyers career), but if flanked with decent linenates, He'd be perfectly fine. Doesn't quite have the speed to go end to end any more, so likely best with a more responsible winger of some sort.
 

CaperJay

Registered User
Sep 27, 2016
248
220
Would look good on the second line in Boston with Hall. Don’t know what it would take though. Debrusk, 1st + ?. Don’t know what Philly biggest needs are
 

captainpaxil

Registered User
Dec 2, 2008
4,708
1,231
Would look good on the second line in Boston with Hall. Don’t know what it would take though. Debrusk, 1st + ?. Don’t know what Philly biggest needs are

Top end c or rhd are thin for the flyers as far as prospects go.
 

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
45,709
14,534
Blanket statement if people are thinking Giroux is a "decent" addition to a playoff team...

Giroux is still a total freak. Best yet underrated forward this past decade. And he's still bringing the heat. God forbid you put him with another offensive wizard... fireworks.

Sounds like Giroux Matthews Marner would be a great line
 

b in vancouver

Registered User
Jul 28, 2005
7,847
5,702
1st, Studnicka, DeBrusk, Moore from the B's. Moore strictly a cap dump, DeBrusk needs his change of scenery and could bounce back, Stud is widely regarded as one of the B's top prospects (not saying much), abd a first is a first.

If he was still a centre. He's not. He's a left-winger. The Bruins have... hmm? I like Giroux and wish there was a fit - but Boston is one of the worst fits for him in the league. As it'd be a lot to trade for an upgrade at #3LW which he unfortunately would be. - through no fault of his own.
He's great at face-offs - but once again Boston has Bergeron who is the best at them.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad