Value of: Christopher Tanev to Toronto

[A1LeafNation]

This thread is exactly why Leafs are going the drafting and developing route.

 

[Menzinger]

If it takes a player like McCann to get Gudbranson and Hall to get Larsson then Tanev could easily fetch Nylander + Marner. Tanev is underrated.

Just because dumb GMs make bad trades doesn't mean the rest of the league will.

 

[Gavy]

If it takes a player like McCann to get Gudbranson and Hall to get Larsson then Tanev could easily fetch Nylander + Marner. Tanev is underrated.

Holy ****. Nylander PLUS Marner? Bahahaha hahaha

If it costs either one of Nylander or Marne, I'd have no problem walking away

 

[clunk]

Holy ****. Nylander PLUS Marner? Bahahaha hahaha

If it costs either one of Nylander or Marne, I'd have no problem walking away

I'm sorry. I never meant for it to get this bad. I just tried to get some agreement on value but this thread has turned nuts, lol. I'm so, so sorry.

 

[Jimmy Firecracker]

If it takes a player like McCann to get Gudbranson and Hall to get Larsson then Tanev could easily fetch Nylander + Marner. Tanev is underrated.

He sure looked like a defensive ace on that first Anaheim goal tonight. Definitely warrants the return of two blue chippers.

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

In terms of player values I think this is pretty close. Fair value is set by the open market, though... so it would depend on what offers Benning would receive from other teams as well.

There would probably have to be a small addition from the Leafs side of things but the basis of the deal would definitely not involve Nylander or Marner. That's laughable and would immediately involve Lou hanging up the phone. Lol

What's laughable is a leafs 1st round pick being a main piece in a trade for Tanev, Tanev playing on the leafs makes them at the very least a borderline playoff team, which makes that pick a mid rounder, not even close to enough to get Tanev.

As it has been said, we don't want to trade him, which means if your team wants him you overpay, ie. your giving up a player you don't want to.

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

He sure looked like a defensive ace on that first Anaheim goal tonight. Definitely warrants the return of two blue chippers.

Yep, GM's totally base value on one single play...

 

[Big Easy]

tanev for ra dickey, tulowitzki and mattthews

Van has no need for Dickey or Tulo, as they do not have a baseball team. Just Benning and the twins.

 

[Jimmy Firecracker]

Yep, GM's totally base value on one single play...

That's what the sarcasm face was for, but looking at it now I can see you'd think I meant it just for the last part of my post.

That proposal is still ridiculous. Two forwards who project to be 60+ scores, one a centre, for a one dimensional defenseman. I don't care how good defensively he is, no 20 point defenseman is worth that much.

You also severely undeeestimate Leafs-LuckTM. Once that pick is in the hands of another team it's guaranteed to be high, regardless of who we traded it for.

 

[Advanced stats]

Bozak+2nd+B prospect

Or

Kadri+3rd+B prospect

Or

Gardiner + B prospect.

Is all I'd feel comfortable trading for a great defensive, 1 dimensional defenseman.

Does any of that interest the Canucks?

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Bozak+2nd+B prospect

Or

Kadri+3rd+B prospect

Or

Gardiner + B prospect.

Is all I'd feel comfortable trading for a great defensive, 1 dimensional defenseman.

Does any of that interest the Canucks?

No.


We don't want to trade Tanev, only thing that will interest us are players your team won't give up.

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

That's what the sarcasm face was for, but looking at it now I can see you'd think I meant it just for the last part of my post.

That proposal is still ridiculous. Two forwards who project to be 60+ scores, one a centre, for a one dimensional defenseman. I don't care how good defensively he is, no 20 point defenseman is worth that much.

You also severely undeeestimate Leafs-LuckTM. Once that pick is in the hands of another team it's guaranteed to be high, regardless of who we traded it for.

I responded to your sarcasm with sarcasm, I thought that was clear.


Great, we'll keep our defensive defenseman, you keep your two superstars.

 

[Sergei Shirokov]

Tanev for Marner

 

[Advanced stats]

No.


We don't want to trade Tanev, only thing that will interest us are players your team won't give up.

Ok no problem.

We'll develop our own defensemen without giving up any assets than.

 

[ACC1224]

Yep, GM's totally base value on one single play...

Of course not.

As this thread has led us to believe, GM's base all player value on one single trade(Hall/Larsson).

 

[scan15*]

Tanev will be 30+ when the Canucks finally decide to rebuild.

We can speculate on trades then.

 

[Liferleafer]

What's laughable is a leafs 1st round pick being a main piece in a trade for Tanev, Tanev playing on the leafs makes them at the very least a borderline playoff team, which makes that pick a mid rounder, not even close to enough to get Tanev.

As it has been said, we don't want to trade him, which means if your team wants him you overpay, ie. your giving up a player you don't want to.

That would make Tanev a bigger miracle worker than Jesus....and that Jesus guy was pretty good....

 

[Liferleafer]

Tanev for Marner

Does the Leafs D suck? Yep. Would Tanev improve it? Yep. Are the Leafs in win now mode? Nope. Does it make sense to trade a blue chipper for a quick fix? Nope.

We will continue to build via the draft.

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

That would make Tanev a bigger miracle worker than Jesus....and that Jesus guy was pretty good....

I said you would be a borderline playoff team, not a contender, if you can't see that having a top pairing of Rielly/Tanev would make a big difference, then I don't know what to tell ya.

 

[Diamonddog01]

Bozak+2nd+B prospect

Or

Kadri+3rd+B prospect

Or

Gardiner + B prospect.

Is all I'd feel comfortable trading for a great defensive, 1 dimensional defenseman.

Does any of that interest the Canucks?

Simply no deal to be made. Terrible proposal in the OP and no common ground to found afterwards. This thread was an immense waste of time.

 

[Liferleafer]

I said you would be a borderline playoff team, not a contender, if you can't see that having a top pairing of Rielly/Tanev would make a big difference, then I don't know what to tell ya.

As i said, he'd be an improvement. I have been wishing him to TO for quite some time....but it doesn't make sense to pay the big price at this stage of our build. The goal isn't to be "borderline" this season, it's to contend in the future. Trading Marner/Nylander isn't an answer to anything....continuing to build via the draft is.

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

As i said, he'd be an improvement. I have been wishing him to TO for quite some time....but it doesn't make sense to pay the big price at this stage of our build. The goal isn't to be "borderline" this season, it's to contend in the future. Trading Marner/Nylander isn't an answer to anything....continuing to build via the draft is.

Oh I totally agree, and that's why I have said through out this thread that there is no way the leafs would do it. My point was made due to one of your fans offering up a 1st rounder, with the addition of Tanev, I think that 1st becomes a mid rounder, which isn't enough in my opinion, that was my only point.

 

[skyo]

Due to contract status' as in JVR is a UFA in a one in a half seasons, what about JVR + kap for Tanner.

 

[Randy Randerson]

Due to contract status' as in JVR is a UFA in a one in a half seasons, what about JVR + kap for Tanner.

Tanner....Tanev?

If so, I could get on board with that as a leaf fan. Kapanen's trade value should rise this season as he gets AHL scoring opportunity, has looked great so far

 

[Nucklehead Supreme]

Tanner....Tanev?

If so, I could get on board with that as a leaf fan. Kapanen's trade value should rise this season as he gets AHL scoring opportunity, has looked great so far

Doesn't Kap look like a perennial 3rd liner? I thought that I have read leafs and pens fans talk about that?