Leonardlizard
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2021
- 3,753
- 5,577
My thinking was that it could have been a big statement win after (4 or 5?) 5 on 3s, but I think youre right.Canucks were saving Demko for Colorado tomorrow, otherwise DeSmith would have come out.
I got lost my apologies??????????????????? truly unlocked!
My thinking was that it could have been a big statement win after (4 or 5?) 5 on 3s, but I think youre right.
It was an awful way to lose and Im sore about it lol
They had a 1.5 min 5-3, a one minute 5-3 and a broken up one between period 2 and 3, so maybe 30s? Where do you get 5 5on3s from?My thinking was that it could have been a big statement win after (4 or 5?) 5 on 3s, but I think youre right.
It was an awful way to lose and Im sore about it lol
If we win all our games to end the season we finish 1st!Edmonton Will pass us soon. I think they can be 3 back if they win their games in hand and they don’t lose many these days.
Also f*** them.
Did they also have four 5 on 3’s to kill off?Every strong team has one of these bad games................ yep.
Did they also have four 5 on 3’s to kill off?
Let me know.
Honestly this is one of the few times a back to back may be beneficial. Boys will be hungry tomorrow.
Colorado is so ****ed.
Can they win with their current goaltending? I think so, there is precedence but it’s extremely rare and not easy.Goaltending cost the Oilers at least one if not two Stanley Cups the past 2 seasons when McJesus was just out of this world. Seems they improved in the net this year. And let's hope we don't repeat that trend. No goaltending, no Stanley (except maybe Edmonton of the 1980s - Fuhr was good but not great).