bernmeister
Registered User
I do not get the point of this at all.
I am not in the know nearly as much as most posters when it comes to cap ramifications and fitting Zib in future plans etc etc .
I know it’s dumbed down , but to me it’s - Rangers need another C . Why would you trade your best one away? What am I missing?
Rangers interests are LIKELY best served atm IF IF IF
they lose his being underpaid at 5.35 this season and next
and implement new deal, Zib goes 8-ish x 4 or 5.
Those #s are affordable given cap reality; they go post 30 but not mid 30.
IF he does not want to do that to stay here, and prefers to exercise his right to test the market to see what is max, THEN rangers have to move him or take nothing as he walks.
That then asks, what is value of Zib a la carte
OR
IF he does have more value in a package?
Which this thread shows is a complicated dynamic
as there are few suitors
and after the 2 yrs of improved cup chances could be paying the piper.