Stewart had completely underachieved in his career and Foligno doesn’t have a great contract.Disagree.
I think Stewart would be a solid addition to the third line wing.Stewart had completely underachieved in his career and Foligno doesn’t have a great contract.
Scouts at yesterday's Leafs vs. Flames gameHe left out who those teams were playing...any like opponents?
I think Stewart would be a solid addition to the third line wing.
I'm not the biggest Evander Kane fan in the world, but i think he would look good on the 2nd line wing.
If you take a look at the GF/GA stats you can see that Bruins are 29th of 31 in goals for with 69 goals. On the other hand have they only allowed 73 goals which ranks them as 5th in the leauge. The question is if there is a need to trade for a goal scorer (hard to do with the cap/contracts and you don't want to give up something on the good defence) or is it the injuries that has hampered the offence? I tend to lend at the later, just wait for the right trade an try to motivate the rookies and core players to produce more offense.
They also have played 3 or 4 fewer games than a lot of teams...
Just curious. Why must it be a left-side defenceman to succeed Chara? Why not simply a defenceman? Chara has always been tasked with elevating the play of his partner. He’s never had a RH Chara as his partner.
First game in person this season. Despite the fact that Nash had 2 assists and a good game overall, it’s clear to me that they could do some damage if the could get a better 3C.
Nash is absolutely valuable to this team, but as a 4C/PK guy.
Bergy, Marchand and Pasta
Krejci, Debrusk Heinen/Bjork/Cehlarik
New 3C, Backes, Heinen/Bjork/Cehlarik
Is a pretty strong and balanced top 3 lines, IMO, especially if Krejci is on.
A kings ransom, I think. Though, he's a darn good player and would look great on one of the top two lines wing.What id HOFFMAN'S contract status in Ottawa ? Sniper, would be deadly with Krejci. Sen's are going nowhere. I would inquire.
I want Wayne Simmonds.
He's 29, and i think he's signed until next season? Just under 4 million... i think.A number of people have said this ...
What's his age and current contract/cap? What will he be looking for in his next contract? 6+? Length? Will the reasons/fears people have not to resign him be the same as those for not resigning Lucci?
I mean if #17 was only making / asking between 3 - 5 mill I'm sure they would have kept him.
But as we know in a cap world teams need ELCs and cut ties with players that price themselves out of the team's cap structure.
So the shinny sparkly toy may be nice to dream about but to acquire might cost the team flexibility and possibly a different core player that people won't want to lose.
Looks like Nash is the guy and that line is hot, in my view they are the #2 line right now. A lighter Backes gives him better foot speed, Heinen is blossoming before our eyes and Nash may have found chemistry with those guys. They cycle the puck so well and read the plays and are good in their own end. I want to Cehlarik back with Krech and DeBrusk or Bjork. Then decide who to move and see who becomes available as teams drop out of the race. The player or players we move may land someone we have never even thought were attainable.
If you're fine wasting what's left of Bergeron and Marchand's prime, then they don't need to make any hockey trades. The truth is, this process should've started 3 years ago. It probably won't happen. By the time the rest of the Bruins prospects are ready to really be part of a championship contending group, those guys are going to be even further into the back end of their careers. The past 3 years were absolutely wasted and it's costing them, and will cost them.The Bruins do not need any hockey trades
Move some contracts for picks keep drafting and rolling you've got a good core and some very nice young players coming up the pipeline. Make Boston a destination again and sign a few free agents when it makes sense (chiarelli was good at this for a time), hire better talent in your pro scouting while you're at it.
If you're fine wasting what's left of Bergeron and Marchand's prime, then they don't need to make any hockey trades. The truth is, this process should've started 3 years ago. It probably won't happen. By the time the rest of the Bruins prospects are ready to really be part of a championship contending group, those guys are going to be even further into the back end of their careers. The past 3 years were absolutely wasted and it's costing them, and will cost them.
I just don’t see Nash continuing to be as effective as he’s been the last couple of games. He’s a 25 point a year guy. I don’t think he’s got the skill level to jump to 40, which is what I feel a 3C should provide.