Tuna99
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2009
- 14,922
- 6,975
Hell Stutzle might make a claim to that title as early as this season.
the way 19 year olds play in the NHL he could be in a Matthew’s category by game 20
Hell Stutzle might make a claim to that title as early as this season.
I have heard this opinion thrown out a few times and I cannot help but laugh at the irony of it...
So the Senators have recently signed Chabot, White, Murray and Batherson to substantial long term contracts, and then they approach Tkachuk with a massive 8x8 contract....and you think that Tkachuk feels that ownership is not committed to building a contender around him?
Does a 64 million dollar offer to a 22 year old who has not actually scored more than 45 points thus far in his career not indicate that ownership is trying to build a contender by signing its own drafted players?
I have a bad feeling this is going to drag into the regular season. Not looking good for future player signings if we can't get our franchise player signed.
Are you having a laugh? Man's the face of the franchise and absolutely should be the captain. Come on nowUnfortunately he has not shown to be a franchise player, I have no idea why everyone is pretending he is
You know this team is still below the cap floor right?
Hes 100% the face of the franchise and captain. Make no mistakeUnfortunately he has not shown to be a franchise player, I have no idea why everyone is pretending he is
Are you having a laugh? Man's the face of the franchise and absolutely should be the captain. Come on now
Are you having a laugh? Man's the face of the franchise and absolutely should be the captain. Come on now
Leading the league in several categories as a 20 & 21 yr old, being the face of the franchise, being the leading scorer for the last two yrs & having the hockey world talk endlessly about his potential. I think that categorizes him as a franchise player, not to mention the talk about them wanting him to be their captain. Chabot could also be categorized as a franchiser player although he plays a completely different style but equally as effective, although less pronounced.Unfortunately he has not shown to be a franchise player, I have no idea why everyone is pretending he is
Are you having a laugh? Man's the face of the franchise and absolutely should be the captain. Come on now
Euge can just sell more horses or get money from one of his many other successful business ventures still going we'll be fiiiiiineYeah but if you add 8,000,000$ for Brady they skyrocket up from 32nd in cap expenditure to 31st.
Leading the league in several categories as a 20 & 21 yr old, being the face of the franchise, being the leading scorer for the last two yrs & having the hockey world talk endlessly about his potential. I think that categorizes him as a franchise player, not to mention the talk about them wanting him to be their captain. Chabot could also be categorized as a franchiser player although he plays a completely different style but equally as effective, although less pronounced.
I have heard this opinion thrown out a few times and I cannot help but laugh at the irony of it...
So the Senators have recently signed Chabot, White, Murray and Batherson to substantial long term contracts, and then they approach Tkachuk with a massive 8x8 contract....and you think that Tkachuk feels that ownership is not committed to building a contender around him?
Does a 64 million dollar offer to a 22 year old who has not actually scored more than 45 points thus far in his career not indicate that ownership is trying to build a contender by signing its own drafted players?
Gonna have to agree on this. Signing Brady would be the big one for me to shows that times have changed and we weren't being lied to again, but here we are.Dude you need to get your lips off of Melnyk's boots for a minute.
Signing a couple of good players does not a contender make. We're literally sitting at the cap floor, and had to go trade for another bottom line guy in Sanford to make it happen. We also didn't go find the top line C or 2nd line RW or the top-4 D Dorion himself said we needed in order to compete.
As it stands we're still very much a bottom-10 team. But keep blaming Tkachuk for being "greedy" instead of pointing fingers at the people responsible for his hesitation to sign long term with a shoestring budget team.
Gonna have to agree on this. Signing Brady would be the big one for me to shows that times have changed and we weren't being lied to again, but here we are.
What we've done so far is the bare minimum of acceptable. Losing Brady or signing him to a death sentence of bridge deal is also unacceptable. It has to be a long term deal.
I was actually thinking of briefly ending my Melnyk boycott to get a Brady jersey. Why in the world would I do that now?
The other side of that coin is if you take Brady off the line with Norris last yr it's possible that Norris doesn't do as well because Brady is the one causing all the confusion in front of the net giving Norris much more room to work with. It works both ways & is simply conjecture or theoretical what if scenarios to suggest, we don't know, it's just an opinion.Unless he has taken the next step I dont see it, if you could clone people and had a top line of all Brady vrs all Norris last year I think Norris would take him.
He is poor defensively falls down and does not put up a lot of points.
I have a bad feeling this is going to drag into the regular season. Not looking good for future player signings if we can't get our franchise player signed.
You know everytime we have to trade of these guys away they sign with the next team within days, hell, minutes it feels like. I'm sorry, but we're acting like spectators in this league at timesEveryone knows that this was going to be a difficult negotiation. Any franchise would be in the same situation unless they went full Dubas and made a horrible capitulation.
Assen na yo!
The other side of that coin is if you take Brady off the line with Norris last yr it's possible that Norris doesn't do as well because Brady is the one causing all the confusion in front of the net giving Norris much more room to work with. It works both ways & is simply conjecture or theoretical what if scenarios to suggest, we don't know, it's just an opinion.
What we do know is that they work well together along with Batherson & maybe, just maybe they need each other together for each of them to succeed individually. It's also an indicator that you need different kinds of players & styles sometimes on the same line for certain players to succeed, some do better with these guys & not so good with those guys. It is what it is.
Farm team.You know everytime we have to trade of these guys away they sign with the next team within days, hell, minutes it feels like. I'm sorry, but we're acting like spectators in this league at times