Dont Toews Me Bro
Registered User
- Mar 20, 2018
- 1,601
- 736
Crawford was the difference THIS season, you will not convince me otherwise.You're living a pipe dream.
Again, you are referencing a 30 game sample size when Crawford was on fire... To refute the 244 game sample size I have provided? Do you possess logical thinking skills? Because there's no logic here. Corey Crawford has a career save percentage of .870 on the PK. Forsberg put up .865 and Glass put up .873 this season. Crawford is pretty much dead in the middle of those two.
Oh, and since 2010-2011, Crawford has been outperformed on the penalty kill by every single one of his backups except Forsberg. Who....is only .005 behind him.
Crawford is not the difference in the PK this season. And historically speaking, he's not even a good PK goalie.
I'm glad you're happy with this terrible coaching staff. I'm sure you'll enjoy the Hawks being awful again next season.
I mean, back to back first round exits and a last place finish are pretty bad. They are already on the way down the hill. Another non-playoff season and you are going to have STH's dropping their tickets in droves. That wait list will dry up pretty quick as well.Yep. If McD is making all the decisions, then this is going to head downhill fast.
I like how the same people who were saying they wouldn’t watch next year if Q came back are now saying “yeah, I figured”. Good call, hockey geniuses!
Not surprised. The writing has been on the wall for Q to stay for half the season at this point.
McD can go **** himself. Useless piece of **** injecting himself into everything even though he knows nothing about hockey. Q staying is entirely on McD. And I'd put money on that.
With this information... like others have said. Q and Stan seem to be joined at the hip now. One goes, they both go.
As for the question of Stan being "allowed" to let Q go if he wanted. He shouldn't need to be "allowed".
He's the damn GM. It should be his decision only. And no, I don't think McD would let Stan fire Q if he wanted to.
Who are these people you're referencing?I like how the same people who were saying they wouldn’t watch next year if Q came back are now saying “yeah, I figured”. Good call, hockey geniuses!
If Bowman said it, that wouldn't make it clear his job was secure though so we would have to hear from John or Rocky on that case. Just the last month has had Bowman quotes talking about how they are going to talk about it later but hadn't yet and he knew his situation wasn't completely secure.
So if Bowman made a statement he wouldn't be answering for his own role.
It obvious Q and Stan aren’t of the same page with regards to this team. I don’t know why the org thinks it’s going to fix itself. In my opinion you either fire one and get someone that works well with the other or clean house.
Standing still is madness.
Chicago teams always seem to do this until they have no other choice.Standing still is madness.
Yep. As is thinking Crawford being healthy and the core playing to their capability(diminishing), solves the myriad of issues that this team has....
we just had the GM meetings, Bowman was asked this multiple times - I don't think anyone would misunderstand him - pretty simple "yes, our coaching staff will return pending any changes Coach Q needs to make with his team, and ALL executive management including myself will be returning as well" ...hard to confuse that, but whatever seems odd it is McD doing it like this the way he has THROUGH Lazerus...