93gilmour93
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2010
- 19,053
- 21,862
oh my god and they say leaf fans are brutal with their proposals, i would offer kerfoot and a first thats is it for rakell, kerfoot is so the salaries balance somewhat.... unbelievable proposals on here, give it up guys
Sure, with all the legal hurdles that entails. And the storage of dynamite.It was harder to catch fish with dynamite then this........
They probably just politely decline if they don't think the offer is good enough.Any trade for Gibson has to have Robertson included or the Ducks GM hangs up on Toronto.
Exactly, the Ducks can deal with any team they want, and if they decide to make a trade, they will take a return that best benefits the Ducks.That is Fine. We'll trade Rakell to Edmonton or Colorado.
Not only a weak draft but also one that is not properly scouted, last years had better scouting until covid19 shut down every league.You think a late first round pick in a weak draft gets you Rakell?
I mean trading rakell for a 1st + something else pretty good (roughly Kerfoot maybe Liljegren value) would just be the ducks admitting they aren't likely to resign him so they're going to settle for some good but not great pieces while simultaneously lowering their own record and increasing the likelihood of a good pick. There's more to trades these days than straight up value. The timelines need to work out age wise and you need to make the most out of your assets. For the record, I do not think a 1st + kerfoot is enough for Rakell but it is a legit offer.You think a late first round pick in a weak draft gets you Rakell?
no it’s not. Anyone thinking it is is absolutely incorrect. It’s not even worth discussing the merits of it because it’s awful for Anaheim and fantastic for the Leafs.I mean trading rakell for a 1st + something else pretty good (roughly Kerfoot maybe Liljegren value) would just be the ducks admitting they aren't likely to resign him so they're going to settle for some good but not great pieces while simultaneously lowering their own record and increasing the likelihood of a good pick. There's more to trades these days than straight up value. The timelines need to work out age wise and you need to make the most out of your assets. For the record, I do not think a 1st + kerfoot is enough for Rakell but it is a legit offer.
The ducks aren't doing anything but rebuilding. If they get more for Rakell then amazing for them but in terms of what is smart for the Leafs to offer then kerf + a 1st and no other major adds is about what the Leafs can do. Not saying its fair but its what the situation is.no it’s not. Anyone thinking it is is absolutely incorrect. It’s not even worth discussing the merits of it because it’s awful for Anaheim and fantastic for the Leafs.
So because we’re rebuilding the only useful asset we get back for Rakell is a late 1st that wont be nhl ready for 3-5 years? And a useless roster player that doesn’t help a rebuilding team at all? Come on lol. There’s no upside to this deal for us and you know it. And you said the offer is legit lol. Only legit for the Leafs. Other teams dont solely exist to help the Leafs you know.The ducks aren't doing anything but rebuilding. If they get more for Rakell then amazing for them but in terms of what is smart for the Leafs to offer then kerf + a 1st and no other major adds is about what the Leafs can do. Not saying its fair but its what the situation is.
Kinda a dumb take tbhThe ducks aren't doing anything but rebuilding. If they get more for Rakell then amazing for them but in terms of what is smart for the Leafs to offer then kerf + a 1st and no other major adds is about what the Leafs can do. Not saying its fair but its what the situation is.
The ducks aren't doing anything but rebuilding. If they get more for Rakell then amazing for them but in terms of what is smart for the Leafs to offer then kerf + a 1st and no other major adds is about what the Leafs can do. Not saying its fair but its what the situation is.
Toronto Maple Leafs
Rickard Rakell (50% retained)
John Gibson
Anaheim Ducks
Frederik Andersen
Alex Kerfoot
Rodion Amirov
Timothy Liljegren
Leafs first round pick of 2021
Kinda a dumb take tbh
That doesn't fix anything nor should anyone be insulted by a message board offer. They are are all complete nonsense. It will s just fun.lets fix this insulting debacle of an offer.
Kerfoot out - Nylander in
Liljegren out- Sandin in.
First round 2021 out - 2022 1st in.
You think a late first round pick in a weak draft gets you Rakell?
I just post thisMakes one wish HF had a 'point and laugh' button in addition to the 'like'...
That is Fine. We'll trade Rakell to Edmonton or Colorado.
It fixes it to a deal that makes sense for the Ducks.That doesn't fix anything nor should anyone be insulted by a message board offer. They are are all complete nonsense. It will s just fun.
i think you should give your head a shake buddy, have you seen kerfoot play i like the player hes fast kills penalties, hes a solid player just not in ducks fans view, his only problem is his numbers but then again he does other things and he plays third line no power play, so whatever duck fans you keep rackell leafs keep kerfoot and move on.NO ONE WANTS KERFOOT. HAVE YOU EVER SEEN ANOTHER TEAM MAKE A PROPOSAL FOR HIM. NO.
lol, awful. Nylander is worth more than Rakell so its basically Sandin Amirov and a 1st for Gibson, which is an overpay.lets fix this insulting debacle of an offer.
Kerfoot out - Nylander in
Liljegren out- Sandin in.
First round 2021 out - 2022 1st in.
Ducks Fans don't have anything against Kerfoot, we just don't need players like him as we already have similar players like Heinen, or Grant or he'd take a roster spot from guys like Jones, Lundestrom or Steel who need NHL minutes to grow. If you need to dump salary, trade him to another team for something but the hes not adding value to the Ducks in a trade. If anything we'd be making things easier for Dubas because he then doesn't have to work out another trade which takes time and in this market is likely hard to do. Nylander may be worth more than Rakell(arguably Rakells lower Cap in this market evens it out quite a bit) so what is Nylander worth in a trade? If you were trading for Nylander what would you give up for him? That is where you should start in a Rakell trade. Sure Rakell wont get as much because hes older and signed for less time but his production and cap him make him very valuable.i think you should give your head a shake buddy, have you seen kerfoot play i like the player hes fast kills penalties, hes a solid player just not in ducks fans view, his only problem is his numbers but then again he does other things and he plays third line no power play, so whatever duck fans you keep rackell leafs keep kerfoot and move on.
Whatever they makeIt fixes it to a deal that makes sense for the Ducks.
you in? Now a deal Toronto makes?
He’s kinda an anchor when he is in the top 6.... I watch and read enough leafs games/forums to know this. It’s also not a piece we’d want, and the only reason kerfoot is involved in deals is to make cap work.... the cap issues arnt Anaheim’s problem.i think you should give your head a shake buddy, have you seen kerfoot play i like the player hes fast kills penalties, hes a solid player just not in ducks fans view, his only problem is his numbers but then again he does other things and he plays third line no power play, so whatever duck fans you keep rackell leafs keep kerfoot and move on.