stutle sounds like hes going to be flithy. Need him or Lafreniere IMO
And i want to win the lottery. There is only one player in this draft that fits this description and frankly who cares? The only thing that matters is what the player ends up being.I want to draft a player who is a star on the ice from day one. None of this learn the game in the minors.
Your expectations are ridiculous and make no sense. You do know they burn a UFA year the sooner they get here. The sens are also going to suck next season to so its essentially a waste. Quinton Byfield likely wont be ready next season but could very well be the best player in the draft but youd rather rush him. Or take a worse prospect because they are NHL ready. The sens are going to have a bunch of exciting young players in the lineup next year no matter who they draft. Formenton, Norris, Brown and Batherson all likely make the team and push for spots.That is true but not the type of player I want in this draft. By the allstar break I want him to be our most dynamic leading scorer and win the calder in a land slide.
@JungleBeat Holtz and Quinn while being debatably the two best goal scorers in the draft arent similar stylistically. Holtz is more of a power shooter while Quinn is more dynamic. I dont believe that in the role Quinn had Holtz would have outproduced him. Raymond might have. Holtz playing with Rossi might have been more productive than Quinn with Rossi had Quinn actually played with him. I think you underate Quinn big time. He can create so much offense by himself. I think Holtz game really translates to the NHL level but he is going to need a good set up man to maximize his skillset. I actually think Raymond and Quinn are more similar from a style stand point. Id be very happy if the sens got any of those three players with the second first rounder.
Very good article. I agree that raymond is being underated by some.
One of those nhl writers had him outside the top 10.
Dude, come on. I know you're a big Quinn fan, but nobody is criticizing Quinn here. Just look at Holtz' numbers from WSIs, international tournaments including World Juniors, SuperElit (most points ever by a U17 until Raymond broke the record), J18Elit (highest p/g ever by a U16), and try to tell me with a straight face that Holtz wouldn't have absolutely f***ing decimated the OHL this year...
People make this critique of Holtz that he's not a line-driver. But a. he drove offense and controlled play a lot more in junior than he did in SHL. Look at the WSI U15s, where he finished ahead of both Byfield and Perfetti in p/g even though they were playing together and he had no teammates close to the same quality. And b. Even if he's not the guy holding on to the puck all the time, he's such an elite goal scorer that he makes playmakers better. You criticize people for being skeptical of Quinn without watching him enough, you should try watching some of Holtz when he was in junior.
I assume since you quoted my post that you would have read it but.... It doesnt appear that way. Literally suggested Holtz would have been more effective than Quinn in a role on a line with Rossi while I believe Quinn is more effective carrying his own line. Can you please show me where I said that Holtz wouldnt have lit up the league?
Holtz decimated the OHL like Quinn did?... Whats your point? Quinn scored at over a goal per game pace his last 40 games. Lots of people have them in the same range........... Holtz doesnt have the one on one creation and scoring ability like Quinn does, he has a harder shot and is harder on the puck while being a more powerful skater. I have watched him plenty. Bottom line is you underate Quinn, you have Mercer ahead of him that alone should be enough to let anyone know you dont like the player.
Does anyone know where to find OHL goals per game league wide?
I'd like to make a post comparing some scoring, but the OHL was inflated this year (so is claimed by many), so I wanted to get an actual measure of the inflation.
I know I could do it manually, but I was hoping past years were already calculated somewhere.
2019 2020 | 3.86 |
2018 2019 | 3.72 |
2017 2018 | 3.54 |
2016 2017 | 3.45 |
2015 2016 | 3.39 |
Quinn had 16 goals last year. Holtz been running rampant on teams goal scoring wise for multiple years in multiple levels of competition.
This isn't close (relatively speaking).
Projected Stat lines | GP | G | A | PTS |
A. Lafreniere | 60 | 38 | 83 | 121 |
A. Holtz | 60 | 68 | 52 | 120 |
M. Rossi | 60 | 38 | 80 | 118 |
T. Stutzle | 60 | 22 | 87 | 109 |
Q. Byfield | 60 | 42 | 66 | 108 |
C. Perfetti | 60 | 36 | 72 | 108 |
L. Raymond | 60 | 40 | 59 | 99 |
N. Gunler | 60 | 29 | 66 | 95 |
A. Lundell | 60 | 31 | 55 | 86 |
R. Amirov | 60 | 39 | 47 | 86 |
J. Quinn | 60 | 48 | 40 | 83 |
Another 2020 mock draft scenario from Larry Fisher. https://thehockeywriters.com/2020-nhl-mock-draft-first-round-scenarios-4/
This one is pretty fantastic for the Sens.
1. Lafreniere
2. Byfield
21. Askarov
Now I never imagined taking a goalie in the 1st. I figured he'd be gone by 21 but he will look pretty juicy if he's still there at 21... Sens would be the envy of the hockey world.
I did some adjustments, and this is what I ended up with. I just did the top prospects that are talked about here the most. I tried to adjust for every player as if they played 20 minutes a game in the OHL this year. Since some players played more than 20 minutes a game or played more than 60 games, some players did lose points in the adjustment.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Projected Stat lines GP G A PTS A. Lafreniere 60 38 83 121 A. Holtz 60 68 52 120 M. Rossi 60 38 80 118 T. Stutzle 60 22 87 109 Q. Byfield 60 42 66 108 C. Perfetti 60 36 72 108 L. Raymond 60 40 59 99 N. Gunler 60 29 66 95 A. Lundell 60 31 55 86 R. Amirov 60 39 47 86 J. Quinn 60 48 40 83
I did some adjustments, and this is what I ended up with. I just did the top prospects that are talked about here the most. I tried to adjust for every player as if they played 20 minutes a game in the OHL this year. Since some players played more than 20 minutes a game or played more than 60 games, some players did lose points in the adjustment.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Projected Stat lines GP G A PTS A. Lafreniere 60 38 83 121 A. Holtz 60 68 52 120 M. Rossi 60 38 80 118 T. Stutzle 60 22 87 109 Q. Byfield 60 42 66 108 C. Perfetti 60 36 72 108 L. Raymond 60 40 59 99 N. Gunler 60 29 66 95 A. Lundell 60 31 55 86 R. Amirov 60 39 47 86 J. Quinn 60 48 40 83
I did some adjustments, and this is what I ended up with. I just did the top prospects that are talked about here the most. I tried to adjust for every player as if they played 20 minutes a game in the OHL this year. Since some players played more than 20 minutes a game or played more than 60 games, some players did lose points in the adjustment.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Projected Stat lines GP G A PTS A. Lafreniere 60 38 83 121 A. Holtz 60 68 52 120 M. Rossi 60 38 80 118 T. Stutzle 60 22 87 109 Q. Byfield 60 42 66 108 C. Perfetti 60 36 72 108 L. Raymond 60 40 59 99 N. Gunler 60 29 66 95 A. Lundell 60 31 55 86 R. Amirov 60 39 47 86 J. Quinn 60 48 40 83
I did some adjustments, and this is what I ended up with. I just did the top prospects that are talked about here the most. I tried to adjust for every player as if they played 20 minutes a game in the OHL this year. Since some players played more than 20 minutes a game or played more than 60 games, some players did lose points in the adjustment.
[TBODY] [/TBODY]
Projected Stat lines GP G A PTS A. Lafreniere 60 38 83 121 A. Holtz 60 68 52 120 M. Rossi 60 38 80 118 T. Stutzle 60 22 87 109 Q. Byfield 60 42 66 108 C. Perfetti 60 36 72 108 L. Raymond 60 40 59 99 N. Gunler 60 29 66 95 A. Lundell 60 31 55 86 R. Amirov 60 39 47 86 J. Quinn 60 48 40 83
I'd like an example of the basic raw data and the formula and the result just for lets say the top 3. 3 different leagues .. and factors.
Is there a factor for time as well as pts or does the factor for pts have the time encapsulated... So looking at NHL equivalency numbers for 2 leagues as an example .. from.. the chart below; How do you equivalence the time or do you need to?
Rossi had mediocre production (65P/53GP) in the OHL last year at the same age as Holtz is now. Does that mean a team shouldn't consider taking him over Holtz?
That's not a good argument. Massive improvement from year-to-year for both Rossi and Quinn matters and their production this year as 18YR olds is far more important in projecting their potential than what they did as 17YR olds.
Lol, I'd kind of like to hear an explanation for this too. Trying to conceptualize accounting for the differences in time on ice just makes my head hurt. Feels like a chicken/egg thing to me.
Also, the NCHC is on the same level as Liiga or NLA? That seems really hard to swallow.