UnSandvich
Registered User
- Sep 7, 2017
- 5,187
- 7,341
We all add...this thread to the ignore list. Horrible all around.I offered two unequal deals.
One deal - good for the Rangers.
Another deal is overpayment.
I will repeat the question - "Who adds?"
Who is trolling who ??You can safely increase the amount of trolling.
Neither fair nor accurate to associate me w/OPI really like how Bern and Bern 2.0 are both "Rangers fans"
wrong! ....The way they both write makes me think it’s Bern with a burner account. He’s been liking his own posts this whole time
and yetThey are different though, I saw them argue once
And before posters start with "You're not getting Shane Wright, or Trevor Zegras for 2 UFA's Zibanejad and Ryan Strome" - that's not what the poster was saying. So don't even waste your time.Honestly...the only way a deal like this ever happens is if the #1 pick and a young C come the other way.
You want to do this for Shane Wright and Trevor Zegras? Sure. You don't move two of the highest scoring centers in the league for what amounts to very little actual help right now - and even then - you're not moving BOTH of them.
They are different though, I saw them argue once
All of your proposals have been awful. At least you’re consistent.I like it when constructive comments appear. I was hoping there would be a lot of offers, especially the Vegas deal.
I wrote:
“I offered two unequal deals. One deal - good for the Rangers. Another deal is overpayment”.
”One deal - good for the Rangers”. This is a Tampa deal.
Rangers – Tampa: Zibanejad (@50% ret) + Strome (@50% ret) = Cirelli.
This exchange is useful to the Rangers. This is my opinion.
”Another deal is overpayment”. It's a Vegas deal.
I wrote:
“I was interested in reading other options for sharing with Vegas.
For example (Rangers - Vegas) - Strome (@ 50% ret) + Georgiev (@ 50% ret) = Krebs”.
I was counting on such proposals. It can be seen that the inclusion of Zibanejad in the Vegas deal is a mistake. The Rangers receive no other 1/2C in return (as in the Tampa deal). The exchange complicates the development of Lafrenière and Kakko. This is a clear overpayment.
This exchange is useful to the Rangers:
Rangers - Vegas - Strome (@ 50% ret) + Georgiev (@ 50% ret) = Krebs.
This is my opinion.
Suggest your options for Rangers deals. Two targets: Cirelli or Krebs.
Calling you 2 similar is quite accurateNeither fair nor accurate to associate me w/OP
wrong! ....
and yet
you insult me with your assessment.