Proposal: Zibanejad and Strome (@ 50% ret) to Tampa or Vegas

[Ice Mammoth]

I have combined these exchanges into one topic. There are similarities: team motivation, lack of free space in the cap space.
These exchanges are different development strategies for the Rangers.
The exchange with Tampa is a ready player.
The exchange with Vegas is a promising player.
Cap space Tampa and Vegas = $ 0.0M.
Both teams have a goal of winning the 2022 Stanley Cup. Obtaining Zibanejad and Strome serves this purpose. The price for these players is affordable for both teams.

1.
Tampa gets:
Zibanejad (@50% ret)
Strome (@50% ret)
Rangers gets:
Cirelli

Finance - difference: $ 0.125M

Tampa gets: strengthened team, increased Stanley Cup winning chances, about $ 5.0M after season. Considering the end of the Palat contract - about $ 10.0M for the conclusion of new contracts with players (UFA). Players are willing to enter into contracts with Tampa at a low cost. Examples are Perry, Bogosian. If Tampa wins the Stanley Cup for the third time, the number of applicants will increase even more. Tampa can connect a third team to the exchange (@ 50% ret). It's very cheap.

Tampa loses Cirelli:
Damage is easily remedied (UFA players).

2.
Vegas gets:
Zibanejad (@50% ret)
Strome (@50% ret)
Rangers gets
Krebs
Smith (conditionally)

Finance - difference: $ 0.075M (including Smith)

Conditionally - exchange Smith.
Chooses Vegas:
Vegas itself changes Smith.
Vegas includes the player in the deal.

Vegas gets: team strengthening, Stanley Cup winning chances Increased, about $ 5.0M after the season.
In case of victory in the Stanley Cup, everything is justified.
In case of failure in the Stanley Cup - Krebs is the price of increasing the chances of winning the Stanley Cup. For $ 5.0M after the season, you can sign a player (UFA). Vegas can connect a third team to the exchange (@ 50% ret). It's very cheap.

Vegas losing - Krebs:
Krebs is the player of the future.In the coming season, the acquired players will bring more value.

Alexandar Georgiev AAV $ 2,425,000 RFA 2022 (@ 50% ret) may be included in the Rangers-Tampa / Vegas deal if required. Tampa / Vegas adds by agreement.
Which is the best option? Who adds?

Click to read more...

 

[ItWasJustified]

This looks like rags are only in the league to help Tampa and Vegas win a cup.

 

[SJinNewJersey]

I don't think the Rags would trade their top 2 centers (in any deal) without getting 2 centers back that are better or equal and have term.

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

I have combined these exchanges into one topic. There are similarities: team motivation, lack of free space in the cap space.
These exchanges are different development strategies for the Rangers.
The exchange with Tampa is a ready player.
The exchange with Vegas is a promising player.
Cap space Tampa and Vegas = $ 0.0M.
Both teams have a goal of winning the 2022 Stanley Cup. Obtaining Zibanejad and Strome serves this purpose. The price for these players is affordable for both teams.

1.
Tampa gets:
Zibanejad (@50% ret)
Strome (@50% ret)
Rangers gets:
Cirelli

Finance - difference: $ 0.125M

Tampa gets: strengthened team, increased Stanley Cup winning chances, about $ 5.0M after season. Considering the end of the Palat contract - about $ 10.0M for the conclusion of new contracts with players (UFA). Players are willing to enter into contracts with Tampa at a low cost. Examples are Perry, Bogosian. If Tampa wins the Stanley Cup for the third time, the number of applicants will increase even more. Tampa can connect a third team to the exchange (@ 50% ret). It's very cheap.

Tampa loses Cirelli:
Damage is easily remedied (UFA players).

2.
Vegas gets:
Zibanejad (@50% ret)
Strome (@50% ret)
Rangers gets
Krebs
Smith (conditionally)

Finance - difference: $ 0.075M (including Smith)

Conditionally - exchange Smith.
Chooses Vegas:
Vegas itself changes Smith.
Vegas includes the player in the deal.

Vegas gets: team strengthening, Stanley Cup winning chances Increased, about $ 5.0M after the season.
In case of victory in the Stanley Cup, everything is justified.
In case of failure in the Stanley Cup - Krebs is the price of increasing the chances of winning the Stanley Cup. For $ 5.0M after the season, you can sign a player (UFA). Vegas can connect a third team to the exchange (@ 50% ret). It's very cheap.

Vegas losing - Krebs:
Krebs is the player of the future.In the coming season, the acquired players will bring more value.

Alexandar Georgiev AAV $ 2,425,000 RFA 2022 (@ 50% ret) may be included in the Rangers-Tampa / Vegas deal if required. Tampa / Vegas adds by agreement.
Which is the best option? Who adds?

Did you even bother to ask why?

 

[Tri state Ranger]

That's gonna be a very hard pass from the Rangers.

 

[SML2]

They fired JD and Gorton because they think it's time to win now. So let's trade our 1 and 2 C.
Sounds like a plan.

 

[HoseEmDown]

I like how Tampa's reasoning is improved chance to win the Cup and they do it by trading a guy who was their 2C on the last two Cup wins.

 

[CasusBelli]

This is Dr. Fraser Crane, wishing you good mental health.

 

[ICanMotteBelieveIt]

Gross.

 

[Saitama]

Why do you hate the Rangers?

 

[TheLegendOfPatPeake]

This is a crap deal. Rangers laugh and hang up.

 

[Ice Mammoth]

I offered two unequal deals.
One deal - good for the Rangers.
Another deal is overpayment.
I will repeat the question - "Who adds?"

 

[Ledge And Dairy]

I really like how Bern and Bern 2.0 are both "Rangers fans"

 

[Number1RedWingsFan52]

LMFAO Tampa can't afford Strome and Zibbanejad long term, And they sure as hell aren't giving up Cirelli for them.

 

[Zats Muccarello]

Is dis a joke

 

[Ice Mammoth]

I'm sorry that I saw only empty criticism in many of the comments.
If the purpose of the answer is to try to humiliate me, the attempt failed.
You can safely increase the amount of trolling.
Don't worry - I won't get hurt.

I have not received an answer to the question - Who adds?
I wrote:
“I offered two unequal deals
One deal - good for the Rangers.
Another deal is overpayment”.

I was interested in reading other options for sharing with Vegas.
For example (Rangers - Vegas) - Strome (@ 50% ret) + Georgiev (@ 50% ret) = Krebs.
The deal becomes similar to Rangers - Tampa.

Suggest your options for Rangers deals. Two targets: Cirelli or Krebs.

P.S. I read comment # 14. Thank you. You disagree with me, but leave a constructive comment.

 

[pld459666]

I offered two unequal deals.
One deal - good for the Rangers.
Another deal is overpayment.
I will repeat the question - "Who adds?"

Neither is good for the Rangers

 

[MtoD]

I'm still trying to figure out how a player is included as a conditional

 

[EK392000]

I really like how Bern and Bern 2.0 are both "Rangers fans"

The way they both write makes me think it’s Bern with a burner account. He’s been liking his own posts this whole time

 

[SnuggaRUDE]

BLUEST OF BLUE CHIPS

 

[SingnBluesOnBroadway]

I'm sorry that I saw only empty criticism in many of the comments.
If the purpose of the answer is to try to humiliate me, the attempt failed.
You can safely increase the amount of trolling.
Don't worry - I won't get hurt.

I have not received an answer to the question - Who adds?
I wrote:
“I offered two unequal deals
One deal - good for the Rangers.
Another deal is overpayment”.

I was interested in reading other options for sharing with Vegas.
For example (Rangers - Vegas) - Strome (@ 50% ret) + Georgiev (@ 50% ret) = Krebs.
The deal becomes similar to Rangers - Tampa.

Suggest your options for Rangers deals. Two targets: Cirelli or Krebs.

P.S. I read comment # 14. Thank you. You disagree with me, but leave a constructive comment.

We didn’t have to try to embarrass you. We did the job all by yourself.

 

[6stringmofo]

I have combined these exchanges into one topic. There are similarities: team motivation, lack of free space in the cap space.
These exchanges are different development strategies for the Rangers.
The exchange with Tampa is a ready player.
The exchange with Vegas is a promising player.
Cap space Tampa and Vegas = $ 0.0M.
Both teams have a goal of winning the 2022 Stanley Cup. Obtaining Zibanejad and Strome serves this purpose. The price for these players is affordable for both teams.

1.
Tampa gets:
Zibanejad (@50% ret)
Strome (@50% ret)
Rangers gets:
Cirelli

Finance - difference: $ 0.125M

Tampa gets: strengthened team, increased Stanley Cup winning chances, about $ 5.0M after season. Considering the end of the Palat contract - about $ 10.0M for the conclusion of new contracts with players (UFA). Players are willing to enter into contracts with Tampa at a low cost. Examples are Perry, Bogosian. If Tampa wins the Stanley Cup for the third time, the number of applicants will increase even more. Tampa can connect a third team to the exchange (@ 50% ret). It's very cheap.

Tampa loses Cirelli:
Damage is easily remedied (UFA players).

2.
Vegas gets:
Zibanejad (@50% ret)
Strome (@50% ret)
Rangers gets
Krebs
Smith (conditionally)

Finance - difference: $ 0.075M (including Smith)

Conditionally - exchange Smith.
Chooses Vegas:
Vegas itself changes Smith.
Vegas includes the player in the deal.

Vegas gets: team strengthening, Stanley Cup winning chances Increased, about $ 5.0M after the season.
In case of victory in the Stanley Cup, everything is justified.
In case of failure in the Stanley Cup - Krebs is the price of increasing the chances of winning the Stanley Cup. For $ 5.0M after the season, you can sign a player (UFA). Vegas can connect a third team to the exchange (@ 50% ret). It's very cheap.

Vegas losing - Krebs:
Krebs is the player of the future.In the coming season, the acquired players will bring more value.

Alexandar Georgiev AAV $ 2,425,000 RFA 2022 (@ 50% ret) may be included in the Rangers-Tampa / Vegas deal if required. Tampa / Vegas adds by agreement.
Which is the best option? Who adds?

I'm so happy you are not a GM.

 

[Ledge And Dairy]

The way they both write makes me think it’s Bern with a burner account. He’s been liking his own posts this whole time

They are different though, I saw them argue once

 

[Golden_Jet]

I have combined these exchanges into one topic. There are similarities: team motivation, lack of free space in the cap space.
These exchanges are different development strategies for the Rangers.
The exchange with Tampa is a ready player.
The exchange with Vegas is a promising player.
Cap space Tampa and Vegas = $ 0.0M.
Both teams have a goal of winning the 2022 Stanley Cup. Obtaining Zibanejad and Strome serves this purpose. The price for these players is affordable for both teams.

1.
Tampa gets:
Zibanejad (@50% ret)
Strome (@50% ret)
Rangers gets:
Cirelli

Finance - difference: $ 0.125M

Tampa gets: strengthened team, increased Stanley Cup winning chances, about $ 5.0M after season. Considering the end of the Palat contract - about $ 10.0M for the conclusion of new contracts with players (UFA). Players are willing to enter into contracts with Tampa at a low cost. Examples are Perry, Bogosian. If Tampa wins the Stanley Cup for the third time, the number of applicants will increase even more. Tampa can connect a third team to the exchange (@ 50% ret). It's very cheap.

Tampa loses Cirelli:
Damage is easily remedied (UFA players).

2.
Vegas gets:
Zibanejad (@50% ret)
Strome (@50% ret)
Rangers gets
Krebs
Smith (conditionally)

Finance - difference: $ 0.075M (including Smith)

Conditionally - exchange Smith.
Chooses Vegas:
Vegas itself changes Smith.
Vegas includes the player in the deal.

Vegas gets: team strengthening, Stanley Cup winning chances Increased, about $ 5.0M after the season.
In case of victory in the Stanley Cup, everything is justified.
In case of failure in the Stanley Cup - Krebs is the price of increasing the chances of winning the Stanley Cup. For $ 5.0M after the season, you can sign a player (UFA). Vegas can connect a third team to the exchange (@ 50% ret). It's very cheap.

Vegas losing - Krebs:
Krebs is the player of the future.In the coming season, the acquired players will bring more value.

Alexandar Georgiev AAV $ 2,425,000 RFA 2022 (@ 50% ret) may be included in the Rangers-Tampa / Vegas deal if required. Tampa / Vegas adds by agreement.
Which is the best option? Who adds?

Wow Tampa and Vegas must have something incriminating on the NYR.

 

[bigdog16]

I'm sorry that I saw only empty criticism in many of the comments.
If the purpose of the answer is to try to humiliate me, the attempt failed.
You can safely increase the amount of trolling.
Don't worry - I won't get hurt.

I have not received an answer to the question - Who adds?
I wrote:
“I offered two unequal deals
One deal - good for the Rangers.
Another deal is overpayment”.

I was interested in reading other options for sharing with Vegas.
For example (Rangers - Vegas) - Strome (@ 50% ret) + Georgiev (@ 50% ret) = Krebs.
The deal becomes similar to Rangers - Tampa.

Suggest your options for Rangers deals. Two targets: Cirelli or Krebs.

P.S. I read comment # 14. Thank you. You disagree with me, but leave a constructive comment.

Both deals are terrible for the Rangers. Zibanejad is far and away the best player involved here and you are trading him 50% retained for a 40 point 2c and a kid who hasn't proven a thing yet.

Zibanejad is a ppg center who had 41 goals 2 years ago