If I am Detroit I am very careful about who gets the C next.
Yzerman
Lidstrom
Zetterberg
Those are huge shoes to fill.
Leave it vacant for a year, then Larkin.
If I am Detroit I am very careful about who gets the C next.
Yzerman
Lidstrom
Zetterberg
Those are huge shoes to fill.
This is great news. 1 more year and Kronwall is gone too thank goodness.
But there's a lot of difference between being functionally retired and never saying it and the organization publicly announcing you're done with no intent to play. Remember, the NHL is run by lawyers. What the Wings say will be held against them. Honestly, I don't know why they put this out in the public. They should have let Z 'try' to come back and fail.Hahahaha, you sweet summer child.
See: Chris Pronger. See: Johan Franzen. See: Marc Savard
He was my favorite Wing. We don't win the Cup in 08 without his efforts and without him the team would likely have gone to mediocrity already back then as well. I don't know if I am sad about it, it's natural. Even Chelios couldn't cheat nature forever.
I'm the same age as Zetterberg, and it's just the passage of time. It's funny because when you start watching sports the players are all much older than you..then they are around your age and finally they're all younger than you. Takes a while to get used to the fact that the last phase is the longest in life.
For the Wings the "Z&D" era really already ended a few years ago. It probably should have ended sooner to be honest. I appreciate Z only played for the Wings but trading him after 2011 may have been sensible for both the Wings and him...for the Wings to initiate a quicker rebuild and for Z to finish his career on a team that isn't just an also-ran.
But there's a lot of difference between being functionally retired and never saying it and the organization publicly announcing you're done with no intent to play. Remember, the NHL is run by lawyers. What the Wings say will be held against them.
Shame the Wings didn't win the 2 other cups they should have easily won.. Oh well.
This is decidedly not good news. This is the end of an era of one of the greatest people to wear the winged wheel. Anyone happy about him being so broken that he can't play is sick in my mind.This is great news. 1 more year and Kronwall is gone too thank goodness.
No. It wouldn't have.
Trading him or Datsyuk in 2011 would have been stupid. Or should Chicago trade Patrick Kane right now? You know, for rebuild purposes.
Z in 2011 was a bonafide #1C who was 30 years old and had a 6M AAV. Saying "man, we should have traded him" is 100% hindsight driven and kinda ridiculous. What the Wings should have done is try to land something big to supplement their two elite Cs.
There is no trade that would have been made in 2011 involving Zetterberg that would have provided Detroit more value than holding onto Z did.
We shouldn't be happy that he's so broken, but we should be happy he's not trying to push through his brokenness anymore. If he kept going, he could have gotten hurt even worse. At least he's got good quality of life now.This is decidedly not good news. This is the end of an era of one of the greatest people to wear the winged wheel. Anyone happy about him being so broken that he can't play is sick in my mind.
This is great news. 1 more year and Kronwall is gone too thank goodness.
And elected him to the HHoF!The league employed someone who was on LTIR...
If they could get a good return for him? Absolutely, since I don't think they make it out of the first round again with this core. But we can start another thread to debate that, since this one is about Hank.Or should Chicago trade Patrick Kane right now? You know, for rebuild purposes.
Leave it vacant or give it to kronwall for his last year while Larkin transitions into that role under kronwall’s wingLeave it vacant for a year, then Larkin.
Yuck. Save that for tomorrow and beyond.