BruinDust
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 24,425
- 21,948
Stempniak didn’t make the team?
I think we should check on his #1 fan!
We haven't heard anything regarding a release for him or Winnik yet.
I'm scared.
Stempniak didn’t make the team?
I think we should check on his #1 fan!
the problem is that the "wait for the right deal to come along" approach more often than not has had them lose good prospects for nothing (Chiller, Subban, Czarnik, Koko, etc.). If they don't see a long-term fit for any of these prospects who are playing well then they need to strike while the iron is hot and get something for them.They don’t have to make a deal yet. Wait for the right guy to come along.
Edit: first they needed a top pairing right D ... people said “trade Carlo, 1st (that became Charlie) and Spooner for Trouba!”. Then we needed scoring wingers. Now we have so many young scoring wingers we have too many. Then it was getting a LD because the kids are too far away, now Vaak is ready and Zboril looked good. Next it’s #3C...and of course in a couple months one of JFK and Frederic will be ready. Let’s wait until someone really great hits the market (not from Ottawa).
the problem is that the "wait for the right deal to come along" approach more often than not has had them lose good prospects for nothing (Chiller, Subban, Czarnik, Koko, etc.). If they don't see a long-term fit for any of these prospects who are playing well then they need to strike while the iron is hot and get something for them.
I dont mind Debrusk there, but Id have Pasta on RW instead of Heinen. Id ont think Marchy and Bergy need Pasta on their wing like #46 does.Based off what?
I'd put them together just so I could say VaakaMcAvoyIt’s tempting to put Vaakanainen with Mcavoy, but this is how I’d start.
It's such a mix of talent and skill and style of play that I don't see how that line is going to have any success.
I'm really just trying to think about the style of this line.
There's no real "playmaker" on the line. Someone who can be that puck possession type and set guys up. Kuraly and Backes are physical guys and Donato isn't. Donato can shoot, but if he's not coming off the rush, his sweet spot is in front of the net...the same as Backes and Kurlay. I guess the way I'm looking at this line is off the rush Kuraly/Backes are crasher to try and suck the defense in, allowing Donato some chances to rip shots from the tops of the dots.
The other thing I try to keep in mind is Cassidy wont hesitate to move guys around. I won't be shocked if at some point the middle 6 turns into...
DeBrusk - Krejci - Donato
Heinen - Kuraly - Backes
^To me that makes more sense for a middle 6. Heinen's game fits so much better with Kuraly/Backes than Donato does. On the flip side, Heinen brings some extra two-way game to that 2nd line.
I don't think Heinen and Krejci are the best mix either...but Heinen def deserves top 6 action, I think he would put up 65+ pts annually.
No bueno on Kuraly as the 3LC. Like the player, but hate that role for him. Hope he proves me wrong.
Will be re-evaluated in 3 weeks. Awesome way to start.
Other ankle.Krug was out for the playoffs with a broken ankle, too. He was in a boot pretty much all summer long. Not a good sign.
From sucking in Dev Camp to Opening Night roster..
Choke on that Haggs.
Congrats Vaak!
Will be re-evaluated in 3 weeks. Awesome way to start.
I think he heard you
Wasn’t he ****ting on Vaakanainen all summer at dev camp lol
YupWasn’t he ****ting on Vaakanainen all summer at dev camp lol