mikeyz
Registered User
- Dec 3, 2013
- 7,313
- 6,358
Agreed 100%The problem with JG’s assessment is that they are playing to standard. It’s been 5 yrs since JT arrived and they've been very consistent.
Agreed 100%The problem with JG’s assessment is that they are playing to standard. It’s been 5 yrs since JT arrived and they've been very consistent.
Maybe the “bullshit they’re giving” is all the core has to give?Neither do I but they both demand salaries of players expected to be leaders at the very top of the league. one of them is literally the most expensive player in the league.
I want a lot more than the bullshit they’re giving rn so it would be satisfying to see Keefe lay into them though we both know it will make no meaningful difference. They have it way too easy here
Getting two means moving a big contract.C+
I haven't been thrilled with how we've been playing but our record is hard to argue with
Get the 1st line going and a defenseman or two gets fit were going be be dangerous and I wouldn't be surprised if we go on a run
I get it, but they are fourth in the conference with games in hand. Making the playoffs won't be the issue.This team isn't likely to make the playoffs.
The first 20 games were loosey-goosey. As things tighten up the Leafs are falling off.
They don't have what it takes to force the play.
Then back to an F next game.Marner went from F to A in one game (which should have surprised nobody)
After the Marchand incident with Liljegren I held out hope they’d want some payback. Not only did they not get retribution, they may gave fueled Marchand. He caused the turnover, scored the winner and then carried it to the next game.I already gave them a D+ but there is literally no difference year to year when it comes to this team; specifically its core.
The new season smell and hockey withdrawal has worn off and I’m already finding myself less and less interested in watching these guys play every other night. Especially after the Boston game on Saturday; that one killed my enthusiasm that somehow maybe they’re different this year when presented with an opportunity to change the narrative.
Same shit, different year. Expect the same results which is disappointment and embarrassment.
After the Marchand incident with Liljegren I held out hope they’d want some payback. Not only did they not get retribution, they may gave fueled Marchand. He caused the turnover, scored the winner and then carried it to the next game.
Chance of making playoffs is literally 100%.Talent, 8 /10
Team play 4/10
Team consistency 3/10
Team Spirit 3/10
Team Preparation 3/10
Coaching effectiveness 3/10
GM effectiveness 2/10
Chances of making playoffs 5/10
Out PTS% in regulation hockey is below .500, that's a pretty good indication that things are exactly as bas as they seem.Matthews and Marner unfortunately responsible for a subpar grade.
Current points % indicates things aren't as bad as they seem though. When those 2 go back to normal we will be very hard to beat.
Badly need a 2-way top 4 though.
The only reason we're as high in the standings as we are is that we're running hot in gimmick points, but OT/shootouts are subject to massive variance and we could go cold in that department at any time.C+
I haven't been thrilled with how we've been playing but our record is hard to argue with
Get the 1st line going and a defenseman or two gets fit were going be be dangerous and I wouldn't be surprised if we go on a run
Really bad use of the word "literally", of course there's a chance they miss the playoffs.Chance of making playoffs is literally 100%.