ClydeLee
Registered User
- Mar 23, 2012
- 11,836
- 5,359
So a GM who is rebuilding is a bad GM?What does the poll, have to do, with this vote?
I say your record should determine, how good a GM you are.
So a GM who is rebuilding is a bad GM?What does the poll, have to do, with this vote?
I say your record should determine, how good a GM you are.
So a GM who is rebuilding is a bad GM?
Idk, say Jeff Gorton. Teams awful, does that make him a bad GM?What is their record? It can also change.
I never said he was the worst, I voted Holland. All I was pointing out was that there are some reasons he is getting so many votes in this poll beyond just the Leafs hatred.You are very incorrect there. See below.
Even if that were true, is he the worst because... he doesnt get your credit for Tavares?
"Worst" is pretty strong. Theres 31 GMs in the league. He must have some pretty bad f*** ups right?
Right?
Idk, say Jeff Gorton. Teams awful, does that make him a bad GM?
I think you have to judge via the intentions of team. Like if they've been trying to win for sure for the last few years and think they're at that contender spot, but can't win a single playoff round. That's a pretty damning indictment of the GM.
Okay. I think you're view is odd for judging by management.That's also in the past.
What's the record now?
I said GMs live in THIS moment.
Okay. I think you're view is odd for judging by management.
Long term and short term decisions are being made by those in that power. Simply right here and now judgements amount to nothing for a GM. Regular season success is also pretty minor of an achievement.
He was considered GM for what 3 years of downward spiraling? He lost one of his top 6 players to FA for nothing, traded one for poor value, and had what looked like a upward young team being diminished.Sakic was considered the worst when COL got filled in that one season
As an example.
Don't worry, when a thread comes up about the Leafs cap situation the narrative will shift to "Dubass is a moron for convincing Tavares to sign in Toronto."Lol. Tavares has cited Dubas and his presentation as a significant factor in him choosing to come to Toronto. Dubas is the only GM in the league who doesn't get credit for his UFA signings.
Tavares also spoke about how much he wanted to remain an Islander, his word is not exactly credible, reality is there is no way Tavares was not going to sign with the Leafs when he entered those meetings, he just used them to get the Leafs to pay as much as possibleLol. Tavares has cited Dubas and his presentation as a significant factor in him choosing to come to Toronto. Dubas is the only GM in the league who doesn't get credit for his UFA signings.
You have no basis to make these claims. His word is very credible. You can want multiple things in life.Tavares also spoke about how much he wanted to remain an Islander, his word is not exactly credible, reality is there is no way Tavares was not going to sign with the Leafs when he entered those meetings, he just used them to get the Leafs to pay as much as possible
Tavares also spoke about how much he wanted to remain an Islander, his word is not exactly credible, reality is there is no way Tavares was not going to sign with the Leafs when he entered those meetings, he just used them to get the Leafs to pay as much as possible
Ha if Tavares told the Islanders he was leaving, than the Leafs would be the clear and decisive front runner and I am guessing they would offer him like 5 year 9 million per contract, he needed the Islanders mainly and of course a few other teams to make the Leafs pay up.Anyone who truly believes this is out to lunch. Tavares had a ton of suiters. He didn't need the Islanders to apply pressure to Toronto. If anything - the Islanders didn't help. San Jose and others (Montreal if he had talked to them) were willing to offer quite a bit more then Toronto/NYI did - and SJ actually did offer more, 13M$ if I remember right. If he wanted leverage, he didn't need NYI.
The truth is he probably wasn't sure where he wanted to play. If he was leaving NYI for sure, he would have told them. It was a last minute decision. NYI were willing to take the risk by not trading him at the deadline.
My basis is based on everything he said in the years leading up to his FA and all the positive changes the Islanders made in his last year and he still did not re-sign, he had no intention on ever re-signing with the Islanders and the evidence is strong, he just needed them to make the Leafs give as much as possibleYou have no basis to make these claims. His word is very credible. You can want multiple things in life.
Nothing he said or did supports any of your claims. You've just made wild, unsupported assumptions and attacks on his character based entirely off of not liking the end result of a decision he came to after a lot of careful consideration.My basis is based on everything he said in the years leading up to his FA and all the positive changes the Islanders made in his last year and he still did not re-sign, he had no intention on ever re-signing with the Islanders and the evidence is strong, he just needed them to make the Leafs give as much as possible
There has already been one of those threads.Don't worry, when a thread comes up about the Leafs cap situation the narrative will shift to "Dubass is a moron for convincing Tavares to sign in Toronto."
Still funny...You have no basis to make these claims. His word is very credible. You can want multiple things in life.
Yes it's true that San Jose offered Tavares 7 years and $13 million AVV.Anyone who truly believes this is out to lunch. Tavares had a ton of suiters. He didn't need the Islanders to apply pressure to Toronto. If anything - the Islanders didn't help. San Jose and others (Montreal if he had talked to them) were willing to offer quite a bit more then Toronto/NYI did - and SJ actually did offer more, 13M$ if I remember right. If he wanted leverage, he didn't need NYI.
The truth is he probably wasn't sure where he wanted to play. If he was leaving NYI for sure, he would have told them. It was a last minute decision. NYI were willing to take the risk by not trading him at the deadline.
literally everything he said and did supports my claim, literally everythingNothing he said or did supports any of your claims. You've just made wild, unsupported assumptions and attacks on his character based entirely off of not liking the end result of a decision he came to after a lot of careful consideration.
The pick ups by Bergevin this off season are all paying off early on. Toffoli 3 goals, Anderson 2 goals, Allen 1-0, Romanov looking like a future #1D, I may be missing a few players. Wonder how this poll will look like if this season continues like this for the Habs. It is still early though.
Am I the only one who thinks Cheveldayof has been making some questionable moves the last several years? Is it all just circumstance, i.e. players wanting out?
Literally everything you're posting is baseless speculation and wrong. Literally everything.literally everything he said and did supports my claim, literally everything
I dunno, I think a few had hopes for top pairing for sure after he had outstanding WJC showings in back to back seasons (among other things), similar to how a few people view Sandin.Credit to Bergevin, but don't you think the bolded might be a big exaggeration? No one expect Habs fans even expected him to be a first pair defenseman before the season and now he's projecting like a 1D?
I like what I have seen Pavel. He has the potential to be a #1D IMO. The question to me is will be a poor man's #1 or a legit #1. He's young, and he's only 9 games into his NHL career. We(I) like to project prospects and young players. It's what we do, as prospects watchers. It's fun. When they get there, it's just stating the obvious, but to state it before it is a fait accompli is far more rewarding.Credit to Bergevin, but don't you think the bolded might be a big exaggeration? No one expect Habs fans even expected him to be a first pair defenseman before the season and now he's projecting like a 1D?