- Dec 12, 2017
- 23,130
- 10,377
I would rather get a Habs tattoo on each side of cheeks, ride a bike with no seat over a bumpy dirt road, and brush my teeth with a razor blade while having raw chili peppers shoved up my nose.....
I would rather get a Habs tattoo on each side of cheeks, ride a bike with no seat over a bumpy dirt road, and brush my teeth with a razor blade while having raw chili peppers shoved up my nose.....
Well, ya gotta be able to score. Team Canada should never be this offensively impotent. Guess they used up all of their goals against the Danes.
Name one thing the coach did wrongTim Hunter was promoted by Ron Wilson. Thats a red flag right there.
Comtois taking the PS, Veleno barely seeing the ice, no chemistry within any of our lines, failure to ignite the Canadian offense.Name one thing the coach did wrong
Comtois taking the PS, Veleno barely seeing the ice, no chemistry within any of our lines, failure to ignite the Canadian offense.
I agree with you about Dipietro, dude was literally the last of our problems, and was a big reason tonight's game was close... But Hunter wasn't good.
Scott has had a better season...
Also, both of todays goals could have (and probably should have) been stopped. ** Disclaimer - I did not watch most of today's game, so cannot judge further than that **
Because Glass, Frost, Suzuki are all on the roster, all clearly more talented offensively than he is.how do you know Comtois wasn't the best choice at the time, explain it in detail to me
also to your point, Frost didn't even play in overtime despite being the leading scorer for Canada. he refused to lean on the best offensive players, even though Canada had an extremely obvious problem scoring goalsBecause Glass, Frost, Suzuki are all on the roster, all clearly more talented offensively than he is.
Who is the leading "goal" scorer on the team?Because Glass, Frost, Suzuki are all on the roster, all clearly more talented offensively than he is.
If Hunter picked Comtois because he has one extra goal over Frost in a sample size of 4 games than that kinda proves my point.Who is the leading "goal" scorer on the team?
If Hunter picked Comtois because he has one extra goal over Frost in a sample size of 4 games than you're kinda proving my point.
You kinda just ignored my point and kept talking ehthose 3 players you mention combined have 1 more goal than Comtois
That's disgusting. Do you cheer for Montreal or Boston after Toronto is (hypothetically) eliminated as well?Uhhmmm
You kinda just ignored my point and kept talking eh
those 3 players you mention combined have 1 more goal than Comtois
First choice definitely would of been Glass or Frost, but Suzuki would've been better than Comtois... f*** I would've rather seen Bouchard take it lol.what's your point, you would have let Suskie take it and he has zero goals in the tourney over the captain who has 5 goals and has 7 points in 10 NHL games this season?
I'm done with you, have a good one .First choice definitely would of been Glass or Frost, but Suzuki would've been better than Comtois... **** I would've rather seen Bouchard take it lol.
10 game sample sizes, 4 game sample sizes -- the afformentioned players are more notable prospects, and have out performed Comtois in junior in MUCH larger sample sizes.
It's fine, Hunter made his choice, I and plenty others don't agree with it.
Cherry called it.Could have used one of those 14 goals against the Danes tonight.
That's disgusting. Do you cheer for Montreal or Boston after Toronto is (hypothetically) eliminated as well?