But we can pick apart a guy that doesn't have end zone coverage that led to a goal?
This is my point. I'd like to hear some positive discussions about what transpired during the game. Or even 1 post about what a great play it was to do it.
and again: there was. earlier. also not a lot of people were ON last night, you have to remember that as well. (I dunno what's going on).
like. the point of discussion is that most people have various points of view -even if they have a similar mindset, someone could see it differently. like...
okay Franson. Franson is having avery good season, and he is helpful now, et cetc etc. that will keep the discussion going.
even saying Carlyle coached a good game today - he did. having several people go "yeah i think he had agood game, but ultimately he's probably going to be fired -something I think everyone knows, including him), what more is there to say. there's nothing at all to counter it. People said it. some people agree. Having 900 posts saying "yeah, Carlyle coached a good game is tired and redundant."
finding reasons why he DIDN'T is WHY losing threads GDT/PGT are longer (or failing to take ahit, or abad save, or awiffed assignment). because there's something to discuss)
it's like saying going to the store and saying t someone. I like vanilla ice cream.
and then I go. I like vanilla too.
what more to do say after that? NO i mean. I REALLY LIKE VANILLA
"ME TOO!"
discussion happens when the person goes -no, vanilla is okay but I like chocolate.
maybe instead of saying "wait where's everyone because we won" why not just start up with "so what about XYZ" and see if it prompts discussion. I'd like to see people stop bickering and fighting and fighting over the silliest things but i have a better chance of waking up a supermodel tomorrow than that happening.