RayzorIsDull
Registered User
The players you are comparing on here are 19 year old draft picks in London/Guelph to 16-17 rookies in Windsor - how can you come to that conclusion when everything is not equal? - it is the old apples and oranges thing. Throw out numbers and "facts" that suit your narrative but this argument holds as much water as an already wet paper bag. Please show us comparable numbers before I for one will buy into your justifications.
No what I am saying is those 4 teams are thought to be contenders in this conference. Nowhere did I say Windsor should be in that group. How about this since you think it's such a narrative and you took this tone I will take those 4 teams and you get the rest of the western conference in the playoffs. I also wasn't comparing players I mentioned a few prior posts earlier the Spits had 8 draft eligible players going into this year now they only have 6. How many of those 6 get drafted? How many in the first 3 rounds?