PetterssonSimp
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2008
- 7,374
- 917
Zero interest from this Canucks fan. Guy is trash, don’t want his kind around my team.
I will answer this way...Nylander has 2 60+ point seasons, he then sat out and struggled to a 27 points in 54 games this season...which is a 41 in 82 pace.
Patrick Laine had 50 points in 82 games this season...while having a full training camp/pre season.
So if everyone on here wants to look at 2 seasons of 60+ point production as an outlier and judge Nylander by ONLY this season....what would you give for 50 point Laine? And remember....using the Nylander logic, you CAN NOT take Laine's other years into consideration.
Toronto would have to trade marner for seth jones. Pesce is not seth jones. pesce is like seth jones was when he was traded for Johansen.I agree and Seth Jones would be even better but doesn’t mean it’s going to happen.
Umm...dude was forced to play center on a line with Marleau and Brown because Kadri is a dum ass....not sure what you thought he was going to produce with 2 cinder blocks on his line.Laine showed up in the playoffs tho.
Did you see Nylander ? Dude was so afraid of any contact.
Yes However Canucks can use Nylander 60 points. His 60 points will definitely help Canucks get in the playoffs.
They should get Pesce and then try to sign Fox. Maybe give liljgren another year but this would be a young and nasty d. A mix of puck movers physicality and youth. turn Nylander into pesce.
d lines would like like this
reilly Pesce
Dermot Fox
Sandin Liljgren
Umm...dude was forced to play center on a line with Marleau and Brown because Kadri is a dum ass....not sure what you thought he was going to produce with 2 cinder blocks on his line.
Yes...because GMs only watch hockey games in 54 game spurts...sucks that Nylander's 2 60+ point seasons have been lost in the black hole....You are going to have to add a lot to turn Nylander into Pesce. They are not in the same area code in terms of value at this point in time.
Why think of something not based at all in reality?
Cool. Now ask yourself this....what are the chances the Leafs move him for cheap? The answer is no chance...thus these threads are not based in any intelligence.Not looking at production...I was watching his mettle.
Did you see the empty net 4th goal ?
He was so casual with the puck in his own zone then when a Bruin was about to hit him he pretty much just surrendered the puck in exchange of not getting hit.
He would be making more than Bo Horvat on the Canucks if we were to trade for Nylander . No chance I'd be able to justify that unless the cost was cheap to acquire him
Yes...because GMs only watch hockey games in 54 game spurts...sucks that Nylander's 2 60+ point seasons have been lost in the black hole....
Hainsey. Gardiner. (Bring in Rosen/Sandin/Borgman). Brown to Edmonton for a 3rd/4th. I still think Marleau goes. Bridge Kap/Johnsson.Leafs can't keep everybody. There is a salary cap and Leafs can't even come close to staying under it without moving quite a bit of cap hit. Nylander's contract was structured to facilitate a trade despite what Dubas says.
If Nylander doesn't go, who does?
Carolina was rumored to be hard after Nylander pre signing. Nylander's contract is custom built for a cash budget team after his bonus is paid.....so you think you would get Pesce for Nylander?
Uh huh.....with a little more point production, you just described Phil Kessel....would you take him and a 2nd for a 7th?2 60 point season don't matter if you turn the puck over constantly, play 0 defense and are afraid of contact. wouldn't take him and a 2nd for a 7th.
Cool. Now ask yourself this....what are the chances the Leafs move him for cheap? The answer is no chance...thus these threads are not based in any intelligence.
Lol..because I can’t read your mind so no I don’t know the answer.Lol...why ask a question you already know the answer to?
We cant be throwing away prospects and picks in all these proposals??? If anything we should be adding. Toronto BADLY needs defense as we saw this playoffs so:
To Vancity: Nylander, 2019 2nd
To Toronto: Tanev, 2020 4th
Leafs can't keep everybody. There is a salary cap and Leafs can't even come close to staying under it without moving quite a bit of cap hit. Nylander's contract was structured to facilitate a trade despite what Dubas says.
If Nylander doesn't go, who does?
I love how this is so often the response when it comes to trading Nylader. Why isn't he getting traded? You'll very likely have three forwards making $10mm+ (two at 11mm+) with one top pairing D man on the entire team.
I understand the premise of not "getting rid of him" but if theres a deal to be made for Nylander that would help the defense it would be silly to not entertain it.
Hainsey. Gardiner. (Bring in Rosen/Sandin/Borgman). Brown to Edmonton for a 3rd/4th. I still think Marleau goes. Bridge Kap/Johnsson.
TML need to free up space for Marner.
I’m sure Leafs brass aren’t thrilled about waiting half a season for Nylander to underachieve for the last half.
Just spitballing:
Nylander
for
Virtanen (15 goals)
Stecher (23 points, +9)
2019 3rd (90th)
Might have some legs? Leafs will need the cap space badly, keep in mind.
You spelled Hughes wrong