since when do we look at the old seasons of a player and not his current season or his playoffs amazing performance ?
god, you don't make any sense it's pathetic and I don't even know where to start.
Marchesseault got 5,5M for 65 goals on 201 NHL games (which was clearly deserved) ? was it a "mistake'' from your pov ?
Tom wilson ? 5.2M after 1 season.
why would he even take a discount for his early prospects season ? you also tend to forget that he is still young.
please enlighten me, lmao.
EDIT: ohhh you are a columbus fan that is why LOL.
Lets start with this, i'm a Hawks fan.
Kinda dumb to compare Marchy's contract to him.
Marchessault last 2 seasons; 57 goals, 126 points, completely different thing wouldn't you agree?
- also Marchessault was a beast in the juniors, so you would expect something to this nature
from him, where as Karlsson... couldn't even score goals in the AHL.
His 40+ goals was mostly result of Knights system,tactics, not because he is a amazing player per say
Marchessault helped him a lot as well, so did Riley Smith, Schmidt, Theodore, Miller and Tuch.
Not dissing Karlsson here, he had a really strong season, scored many many goals, he surely knows how to
score goals (even thou couldn't much before) but most likely he will not repeat his 40+ goal season.
3,5 is the real money for him and George McPhee knows this, he shouldn't change his mind
and give more money than that, if an agreement cannot be made...then, so be it.