Montreal will most likely have to retain on both and take a bad contract in return( i am ok up to 5 years).What, realistically, do posters think Price and Weber could get in a trade?
Price is coming off a horrific season, Weber is coming off an ankle injury, and both have a contract that takes them to 2026.
What, realistically, do posters think Price and Weber could get in a trade?
Price is coming off a horrific season, Weber is coming off an ankle injury, and both have a contract that takes them to 2026.
I think that's a weird way of looking. You look at teams with holes beyond the #1C however how many playoff teams or cup winners don't have a #1C or a #1A/#1B situation? I think it's very very small.
#1C alone isn't enough but a #1C, #1LW, #1D, #1G is a great place to start.
Although I will concede there is more than 1 way to make a good team so balance can be had but we don't have that either and aren't close.
I agree with you completely. What I'm pointing out is that the roster gaps on their own are symptomatic of the main problem, bad management.
Fix that first, then there is a chance at seeing the roster needs properly addressed in a sustainable way.
Most GM's would love to have Price/Weber............maybe the question should be, can MB build a team, that can have Price/Weber on it?
I see our GM as the problem, not Price/Weber.
Habs fans have a tendency to focus on problems that don't really exist instead of on the ones which do. Price admittedly had a bad season and Weber was injured. However, when these two players are at their "normal", they are the least of our worries. What's keeping the Habs from winning isn't Price's contract or Weber's age. Price and Weber are, most of the time, two of the very few things about this team that are good.
First of all, if Price is has good as he was before this season. His contract isn't a problem.
Not with 3.9M to Shaw, 4.6M to Alzner and freaking 9M$ in dead cap space.
If he sucks as he did this year, then it's a terrible problem for the next 4 years.
Why 4 years? Cause in 4 years, it's time to negotiate a new CBA....and then everything changes and some get out of jail free card will be negotiate like last time.
We need C
We need PMD
And if everything is well during the season, you add a Stastny like the Jets did, or a McDonagh like Tampa did. I don't expect to have full perfect team in September.
The Habs have way too much wingers and there's some quality in there.
Will probably end up with around 13-14M of free Cap Space with only 1 contract to add
3rd overall pick + 4 second round pick
The way i see it, Bergevin has a lot of assets to fix the problems but i don't think he can do it.
They haven't addressed a 1C in 25 years.There's 0 chance this team can be built into a contender while Price and Weber are still effective in their role vs salary.
They need to come up with two top line Cs and a top pairing LD in 3 years. That's not happening. They haven't addressed one in 6.
First of all, if Price is has good as he was before this season. His contract isn't a problem.
Not with 3.9M to Shaw, 4.6M to Alzner and freaking 9M$ in dead cap space.
If he sucks as he did this year, then it's a terrible problem for the next 4 years.
Why 4 years? Cause in 4 years, it's time to negotiate a new CBA....and then everything changes and some get out of jail free card will be negotiate like last time.
We need C
We need PMD
And if everything is well during the season, you add a Stastny like the Jets did, or a McDonagh like Tampa did. I don't expect to have full perfect team in September.
The Habs have way too much wingers and there's some quality in there.
Will probably end up with around 13-14M of free Cap Space with only 1 contract to add
3rd overall pick + 4 second round pick
The way i see it, Bergevin has a lot of assets to fix the problems but i don't think he can do it.
That's wishful thinking. The get out of jail free card is because of changes to the player's share of HRR.
I doubt the players go even more under this time, I don't see a big change.
It's not only about that. Many teams feels the Cap should be tweek in order to give teams equals value in amount of money (Taxes). It would make sense in order to get even more parity. Some wants to renegotiate the rebuy process.
Many many things can happen.
It's ridiculous. As much as it can benefit us some teams don't spend to cap, should there be an adjustment for that?
Some teams don't sell as much merchandise either, do they get a pass?
At a certain point doing that is just helping teams like us, Toronto, NYR not only pay more for office staff but also get more players. It's unfair.
Do you think it's unfair that Tampa could locked Stamkos at 8,5M and that's like $10M for other teams to match?
Do you think it's unfair that if Montreal wants to hunt for Tavares they will have to give 2M$ more just to match the other offers?
Do you think it's unfair that Dallas offer was worth a lot more than MTL offer to Radulov even if (apparently) it was the same offer?
What is happening now is kind of unfair too.
If 10M is worth 10M for every teams, at least on the cap, then everybody got an equal chance at managing that cap and sign UFA's.
We got 5 years to figure it out. Imagine if the Jets felt like they couldn’t win with Byfuglien a few years ago? Think about their roster without him today?