SammyTheBull
Registered User
- Dec 1, 2005
- 4,515
- 0
Why is this even a thread? It's obviously a botch.
Also, again- why is Malkin already being mentioned in the same breath as Ovechkin and Crosby? Wake me up when he scores 100 pts or wins a Selke. He has his own hurdles to clear.
Is it Kessel's fault that he plays in the NCAA and not Russia? Is it Kessel's fault that he's an 18 year old freshman while Malkin is a 20 year old 3rd year pro? Malkin's game is much more developed at this stage, Kessel is still very raw.No way.
First Malkin has a tremendous all around game, Kessel is a one way puck hog. Kessel has outstanding speed and finishing ability but he's not going to be looked at like a franchise player. He'll at best, be a second tier star IE: Not a 1A franchise player ALA a Crosby/Phanuef/Malkin.
and competition wise Russia >>>> NCAA, and Malkin has dominated Russia.
No. I don't know what I'm talking about, obviously.
To say his ceiling is that of two of the better players in NHL HISTORY is more or less Pejorative Slured.
For now, I'd say his ceiling is that of a Fedorov like player. Maybe a tiny bit better. But Fedorov was a machine in his prime years and I honestly doubt Malkin is ever as good as he was.
Is it Kessel's fault that he plays in the NCAA and not Russia? Is it Kessel's fault that he's an 18 year old freshman while Malkin is a 20 year old 3rd year pro? Malkin's game is much more developed at this stage, Kessel is still very raw.
Give him more than 1 year in the NCAA before you dismiss him as simply a one dimensional puck hog and a 2nd tier star.
Malkin is as close to a sure thing as there is outside the NHL, but I still don't think he's a Gretzky or a Lemieux.
Yes... so by your logic if Ovechkin decided to play in Japan (letsay he loves sushi) instead of comming over to the NHL this past year he would be a crap player who shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentance as Crosby.
No. I don't know what I'm talking about, obviously.
To say his ceiling is that of two of the better players in NHL HISTORY is more or less Pejorative Slured.
For now, I'd say his ceiling is that of a Fedorov like player. Maybe a tiny bit better. But Fedorov was a machine in his prime years and I honestly doubt Malkin is ever as good as he was.
Hey guys, gonna chime in with my thoughts on the Kessel *** kissing Iève been watching for a bit now.
First off, the guy who said that Kessel is better than Crosby (or CAN be) must not be that serious of a hockey fan.
I dont think you realize how good that record was that Crosby broke was... or just how hard of a worker he is. heès incredible. YOU KNOW youère watching a Franchise player when youère watching Sid. Very few players offer the same high level hockey game as Sid Crosby. VERY FEW.
Weève been very fortunate to see a few pass by over the past few years...
I have seen Kessel perform, and Ive also seen poor games from Phil as well.
A great question from me to you... Has Phil ever carried players like Sidney has
Answer: Hell no. Never. Not in this lifetime (as of yet).
Phil wasnt even the best player on his team. offense wise, and was not effective enough to even garner first line minutes in the NCAA this year. Say what you like, but prospects make their own luck in these circumstances.
Sid weève seen since he was a tyke, he led Rimouski all by himself, and nearly carried them to the most prestigious amateur trophy in Canada (before finally being stopped in the final game by a LEGENDARY London team, that broke MANY records that year).
Look at Pittsburgh last year... How many times was he Pittsburghès best player...
How many times was HE the one calling the shots AT 18... Because people respect him... He knows exactly what he wants... when he wants... completely respectful, yet also completely knows what he wants... the temperment of a professional...
Kessel was the diamond jewel to the American Junior disappointing Gold Medal favourites. He was expected to help make the States major contenders for a gold medal... Nope. What did they get... One goal. 1 GOAL... say it with me now... ONE GOAL. He was not dominating, he wasnt making those around him better (in fact it was he getting the passing due to his notorious fame of being such a high end bluechip prospect)...
I believe we are harsh typically in comparing because we draw strengths to weaknesses...
Let me tell you guys what I see in Kessel, and why he slipped...
I believe Phil Kessel will be a poor mans Brett Hull (honestly). Reason... hes a shooter, but he doesnt bury it like the golden brett did. hes flashy, but completely inconsistent... and those not seeing him hog the puck from time to time (a la sniper) are kidding themselves.
He does not have a pure offensive vision... he has the talents... but no brains. He doesnt think the game well... which to answer any question as to why he slipped, and why he went from compared to Crosby (which was to lower the hype on the draft field of last year, and get excited over this past years) to # 5 selection. Those who dont believe me... or this post, only have to look at recent memory to see that Spezza was in a similar situation... all I ask is where did he fall to in his draft year... the same speculation... the same hype... similar in the sense that he underperformed in his draft year... If you guessed # 2... youèd be correct. Dropping 5 spots... thatès not favourable... it sometimes means scouts found something that is not good there... A chip in his armour... And let me say, Malkin and Ovechkin have been compared since the year prior to their draft... neither one of them had the same discussions since...
All of this in consideration... and to be honest, Kessel has a hard time cracking my top 10 prospects around the NHL... Heès going to be good... However heès NOT going to be great... Ovechkin, Crosby, and Malkin will be.
now taking the 4 guys drafted in front of him, and add in 2 strong prospects,and you see how easily Kessel falls out of the top 10...
To be very blunt... to ensure his high end status... Kessel needs a rebound performance this year...
Now obviously people will outright disagree with my views, please understand its not my intention to burn Kessel... just debate with some fine hockey fans such as yourselves
Bingo. Kessel's game against norway can not and should not reflect his skill.
Well player X scored alot against a back up goalie with the team playing back to back days. So that game should not count.
Petty, Petty and oh yeah Petty.
I was also unaware that Kessel was the only one to play against Norway. Why didn't other talents score in bunches too?
When you use "Player x", that totally makes it not credible. If you give a solid example, it actually...uhm...makes sense.
Kessel has more offensive ability than Crosby if he reaches it.
Sabesfan said:Crosby is going to be the 2nd best player in the league behind Ovechkin for the next 15 years!
Yes... so by your logic if Ovechkin decided to play in Japan (letsay he loves sushi) instead of comming over to the NHL this past year he would be a crap player who shouldn't be mentioned in the same sentance as Crosby. Sorry mate, but your and the general logic of people who discredit Malkin is flawed. A player is the same quality of player regardless of which league he plays in. Someone making the jump from the ECHL to the NHL doesn't automatically make them better nor would Gretzky be any worse in his prime if he decided to play a few games in a local beer league.
I wouldn't go that far. Its just two different types of hockey. There are plenty of NHL players that wouldn't do much in the RSL.Your post is inherently flawed.
Dominating an inferior league is not the same as dominating the NHL and I think that's what people are saying.
Not that Malkin is terrible just because he played in the RSL but rather, Malkin dominating the RSL is not nearly of the same value as an even younger Sidney Crosby or even an older AO dominating the NHL.
The RSL is simply not as good as the NHL. Not even close. The folks here just want to see Malkin prove himself against some tougher competition before proclaiming him the saviour.
The Olympics was a sampling, but who knows...
Uh, no he doesn't. Homer alert!
Do you realize Heatley didn't lead his team in scoring his freshman year. So Reinprect is clearly better than Heatley becasue he out scored him right? The kid is 18. Who cares what he did in one tourney. And yes he only had a goal. But he still lead the tourney in scoring. So does that mean his passing is greatley underated. A poor mans shooting Brett Hull. But with the abilty to pass like a guy that can lead a tourney in assists. Does not sound bad at all.
But i will save these all. And in five years. I hope you are all ready to print it off and eat the e-mail. This is not the first nor the last time. Someone has been totally written off before they even put on an NHL sweater. Or someone has been put on such a pedistal.
Reminds of when ESPN had Kurt Warner as one of the best quarterbacks ever. Time will tell. But keep on predicating the future. I see as you are all right everytime. So why should this time be any different.
To say that Kessel is as talented as Crosby is getting a little crazy now.... Crosby is going to be the best player in the league ahead of Ovechkin for the next 15 years!
I wouldn't go that far. Its just two different types of hockey. There are plenty of NHL players that wouldn't do much in the RSL.
The calibre of NHL hockey is significantly better than the calibre of RSL hockey.
The ability of specific players to accalamate to a certain style of game not withstanding.
Crosby is already better than Ovechkin. Kessel is a step below Crosby, Ovechkin, and Malkin.