93gilmour93
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2010
- 19,106
- 21,986
It's almost like they care more about winning the Stanley Cup than getting paid for playing in the playoffs. Shocking!
Almost like its not their job at that point, which isn't shocking because thats exactly what I was saying.
I really want to vote for Option 2 but that basically means you're paying $70 million for a single Cup win - I don't think it's worth it.
These are my thoughts exactly.Option 2 easily for me.
You get the thrill of winning at least one Stanley Cup and more money than you'll ever need to be happy. And at 85 million career earnings, it means you were a pretty good player.
Option 3 is nice for the Cups but with "only" 15 million in career earnings (more than enough in normal circumstance IMO), that means you were a 3rd or 4th line plug.
Option 1 is fine if you think moar money means more happiness. You are a Crosby level player that will forever be perceived as a loser. Enjoy the extra 70 million that you would wish you could trade in for at least one Cup.
It is definitely worth it.I really want to vote for Option 2 but that basically means you're paying $70 million for a single Cup win - I don't think it's worth it.
That wouldn't be a true championship though. You wouldn't have the experience of winning the championship.With 70 million extra dollars I can throw a few hundred thousand to make a Cup replica and then buy an island.
Exactly.Option 2 for sure.
Quality of life doesn't really change that much after a certain point haha.
I would.What kind of an idiot would pay $70M to win a cup?
You could still make large charitable donations at $85 million career earnings.People thinking there’s ‘not much difference’ between $85 and $155 million... Take the $155 million and then donate half to charity. Insane not to take the sizeably more amount of money.
A savvy investor can make $85 million turn into generational wealth.I'm a bit confused at all those saying that 70 million isn't a big difference. Remind me to never hire you as my company's CFO. In the hands of a business-savvy investor, that extra 70 million is MASSIVE for generational wealth growth, especially assuming how much of your earned wages have already been eaten up by taxes.
In my case I just have 3 siblings who I'd help out, and that's about it. And if 85 million is enough for you than take the 155 million and give away 70 million. Even giving it to charity would be more meaningful than 1 Stanley Cup.
Most rich people were born rich, professional athletes/celebrities losing everything is not a common occurrence, its just noteworthy when it happens.
only 15 millions lmao
IVE BEEN WORKING FOR 15 YEARS AND HAVEN'T EVEN MADE 1% OF THAT