1)
"[list of players] are shit, they suck, I can't wait to get rid of their sorry loser asses."
vs.
"We'll send you [few, some, all of the players in that list] for a 1st" / "if you want [any one player in that list] it's going to cost you at least a 1st."
2)
"This league is too soft, there's no emotion, we need more hate in the game,."
vs.
[guy does something trivial that pisses off people] "No, not that shit, that's against the code."
3)
"We need to make it easier for teams to make trades, keep their own players, etc."
vs.
Every idea that makes the salary cap more inflexible - like "a player's salary should just be his cap hit" and "we need to shorten how long a player can sign a contract"
vs.
Franchise player tagging, or cap discounts for homegrown players, or other ideas that would put the players - who have already made it clear they don't like escrow and want to reduce it - in Escrow Hell.
4)
"We need more divisional games to build rivalries"
vs.
"JFC, why are we playing [divisional rival] again? We need fewer games against division teams, this is too much."
5) Why poor attendance is a bad thing, conditional on where a team is located. Mentioned above.
6)
"Divisional playoffs build rivalries, we need more of that"
vs.
"The current playoff system sucks, we need to go back to 1-8 in the conference."
And while not contradictions, there's also a long list of ideas that get offered every 3-4 months as if no one else has ever thought about them, or that they haven't been discussed [and 99% of the time picked apart because they were terrible the 1st time around, and the 15th time they're not any better].