burpsalot
Registered User
- Feb 12, 2015
- 5,633
- 0
Making a play for Staal is one way to accelerate things but it would be way too costly IMO
OMG, I just puked.
Making a play for Staal is one way to accelerate things but it would be way too costly IMO
Im slowly starting to lean towards being okay with letting JVR go. I am atpeace with the fact that Blowzak is bad and Lupul is a stopgap. Kadri might be salvageable but at this point if they can get a good haul for JVR or Kadri, I say do it.
Making a play for Staal is one way to accelerate things but it would be way too costly IMO
Im slowly starting to lean towards being okay with letting JVR go. I am atpeace with the fact that Blowzak is bad and Lupul is a stopgap. Kadri might be salvageable but at this point if they can get a good haul for JVR or Kadri, I say do it.
Ya... I thought we should have traded the whole top line... instead, we only traded Kessel.
All this talk of rebuild, there's gonna be pain, etc.... the only guy we traded was Kessel. Not exactly a new team IMO. We have all the same players as last year except for Kessel, Clarkson, Franson, Santorelli, and Trevor Smith.
And Clarkson, Franson, and Santorelli were gone during last season. We've only made 1 trade and it was Kessel.
It was obvious this team should have been blown up... but we didn't blow it up... we kept pretty much everyone except for Kessel.
When we traded Kessel, I thought it was the first of many trades to come. I kept waiting... and nothing happened.
Ya... I thought we should have traded the whole top line... instead, we only traded Kessel.
All this talk of rebuild, there's gonna be pain, etc.... the only guy we traded was Kessel. Not exactly a new team IMO. We have all the same players as last year except for Kessel, Clarkson, Franson, Santorelli, and Trevor Smith.
And Clarkson, Franson, and Santorelli were gone during last season. We've only made 1 trade and it was Kessel.
It was obvious this team should have been blown up... but we didn't blow it up... we kept pretty much everyone except for Kessel.
When we traded Kessel, I thought it was the first of many trades to come. I kept waiting... and nothing happened.
Babcock is a hockey lifer. He knew what he was getting into. He knows that Randy Carlyle isn't an idiot, just another hockey guy handcuffed by the enhanced status of the coddled athletes he was trying to lead. Babcock knew that there are individuals on this team who may prove to be too stubborn, too unteachable, too arrogant or too comfortable to alter their games for team goals. Babcock will only regret coming here if external forces at MLSE start standing in his way making sound personnel decisions based on merit under Babcock's criteria not the marketing department's criteria.
Sometimes players with iffy team concept pedigree can be converted. It used to happen in New Jersey all of the time where individually talented players like Bobby Carpenter Bernie Nicholls, Alex Mogilny, Stephane Richer were convinced to put the team ahead of personal goals. I assume that's the hope right now with players like JVR, Bozak, Kadri and Lupul that maybe one or more of them can eventually buy out. And by buy in, not with hollow words, but with consistent actions on the ice.
He'll just stand, unmoving at our blue line.
The only reason I care if players like Bozak and Lupul buy in, it's so that they will raise their trade value so that the Leafs can move them the hell out.
This - they have no future here.
People keep waiting for these players to raise their value.
I think that ship has sailed. 1 month,5 months,1 year, it is what it is now.
Even if it means we move them for other players with 2 years left on their deal instead of 3 at this point i'd consider it a win.
Even if it means we move them for other players with 2 years left on their deal instead of 3 at this point i'd consider it a win.
here is a legitimate question:
if they couldn't do it for Wilson
if they couldn't do it for Carlyle
it they couldn't (or just "supply teachered - which imo is worse) for Horachek
why is it just "poof" Babcock will make them better.
something what you see if what you get.
just say thanks, and move on
So wait,
Dion still sucks and Phil wasn't the problem with the first line? My gawd. I wish someone could've realized this!
So wait,
Dion still sucks and Phil wasn't the problem with the first line? My gawd. I wish someone could've realized this!
both need to go.
but babcock wants dion as his pet.
Phil wasn't THE problem, but he was a problem, and needed to be moved for the rebuild. We got 3 very good assets for him.
And no, Dion doesn't "suck"
Phil wasn't THE problem, but he was a problem, and needed to be moved for the rebuild. We got 3 very good assets for him.
And no, Dion doesn't "suck"
Phil wasn't THE problem, but he was a problem, and needed to be moved for the rebuild. We got 3 very good assets for him.
And no, Dion doesn't "suck"