Well on the topic of Varly... tbh I would prefer us not to have to be associated with all this in general.
As a also Ravens fan, I know what its like to deal with media.. fans.. perception when you have 'criminals' on your team. And its never good, only the actual fans of the team usually understand.
But inevitably, your whole team will suffer.
I'm fine with Pickard, regardless of how inconsistent he can be. Varly is old anyways.
I didnt even follow this.. Im fairly new to this sport and fanbase to be honest. Been a Avs fan for only two years now.
Did they even find any HARD evidence that said he DIDNT do it?
Or do we know for a fact he did it?
Associated with what? No conviction, never even charged, the suit went nowhere with a jury and she had to pay his legal fees. If people educated on the whole case think he's a criminal they likely suffer from some mental block or have a very low IQ, so who cares about their opinion. There is no way any sane person can actually examine the facts and say he's guilty. A jury in the civil case, with a far lower level of burden of proof required, made HER pay HIM. And Varly...old? He's 27.
Hard evidence he DIDN'T do it?? I'm sorry, but, what? How do you propose hard evidence of that?? The only hard evidence you could have of that would be video footage from inside the room of the entire incident. So no, there is no hard evidence he didn't do it, but he shouldn't have to prove he didn't do it. Innocent until proven guilty and all that? Allegations mean nothing without evidence, and she seemingly had no evidence, so Varlamov, to all of us, should be 100% innocent until
proven otherwise.
And if we knew for a fact he DID do it, the DA would have pressed charges and she would have won her suit. Seriously...how did you even have to ask that.