BonHoonLayneCornell
Registered User
I don't consider it a comparable because Pittsburgh was obviously cooked at that point after their 110% offense only system owned by Jersey in the playoffs and were on the cusp of losing Lemieux again. They had 5 of the top 6 scorers on that team and literally nothing else. The next best player was Andrew Ference. They knew their time was done and had no semblance of a prospect system to replace them. We had moves to make, but there was still a solid group to work with and yes, a solid list of players needing to be replaced as well.Yeah.... I'm not so sure about that. Turris, Phaneuf and Brassard were all healthy scratches at one point this season. Methot can barely stay healthy. Anderson is almost 40. That's our top 2 centers, 2 of our top 4 defensemen, and our #1G from our 2017 cup run. Our core was on the precipice of declining.
The Duchene trade was supposed to help us extend the window before it closed sometime either last season or this season, but we all know what happened after that.
It may be splitting hairs, but Karlsson, Stone, Duchene, Hoffman & Dzingel were not why things fell apart in Ottawa in 2017-18. With your list of players that were either under performing, aging or injured, added with our current complete waste of money veteran core, we'd just flat out stockpiled way too much money not pulling its weight to be able to maneuver anymore. It's water under the bridge now, but either way that's not on Karlsson, Stone, etc., it's on the people putting the team together around them. Maybe it was an impossible situation and they had no choice but to do what they did, but it still rings true that it was not on those core of players we actually wanted to keep.
The problem with a move like the Duchene deal you reference was the need for dollars in dollars out as usual. The roster obviously needed to add, particularly on defense, but all we could do was shuffle our top center as our big move, and we actually sent a solid contributor at the time to make it happen.