The 2010s was a pretty bad decade for music, imo. Not a whole lot of albums I'd consider memorable.
The 00's had countless new bands and albums that maybe weren't always original, but they felt fresh and some of my all time favorite records were released during that decade.
It's like the entire music industry suddenly hit a wall.
Sorry for the text wall in advance.
My opinion on the decade overall is that there were a lot of good songs, probably as many as the 2000s... from a lot of artists from all manner of genres...
but not too many good albums. So many artists with ~2 or so good songs in a sea of mediocrity.
Probably a large part due to the way that music went with the advent of music streaming, downloading etc.
While more bands had a platform, at the same time unless bands doing it off their backs, or already well established, no-one is giving them a million to make an album, unlimited studio time, paid for retreats for months together. And one-off songs, small EPs etc are more common. And a lot of albums are just mashed together songs surrounding a couple of great ones to capitalise on their popular success. Not too many bands are focusing on an album when it used to be a money maker. Now selling tshirts makes more.
And while now everyone "can" be a producer and engineer in their own home, and some great tracks have been released like that, well... having a studio engineer and a producer who have a lot of experience, know the sound they want, what the music "can" be is not as common as it was, and studio time is f***ing expensive. And some amazing musicians make shoddy engineers and producers, just like some mediocre musicians and songwriters have made amazing engineers and producers. It is rare for someone to be masters of 2/4, let alone 3/4 or 4/4... Joseph Mount of Metronomy comes to mind (and still, four albums in the decade and only one is amazing, one other damn good, and two more with some great songs but overall just "solid"), but there are not many.
And even if there are great songwriters, in a great band, with the will to make an album... and they get the studio time, and a good producer and engineer... then to really make it an "album" in my eyes it should really be well curated, probably coming with 30+ songs and whittling it down to what fits... and working together. It used to be people would often leave a great song off an album for the next one if it did not fit. Less so now.
I mean, there are maybe more "studios" than ever. But "pro" studies are not like they were for the most part. How many have several rooms, basically a personal library of musical instruments, pedals, amps...
my brother is a sound engineer... and he has a studio in the basement (with a proper vocal booth and desk)... but of course the difference between a pro studio and his selection of ~7 guitars, ~2 basses, 1 drumkit, 1 drum machine and ~20 pedals and ~7 or so mics and ~3 keyboards is enormous. And a lot of albums from smaller bands are made in such spaces or low end local studios.
The difference between recording with him in a proper studio he had free access to a few years ago vs his, I mean, jeez. Just night and day.
One of the best albums ever for me is The Waterboys Fisherman's Blues. They went to Ireland for over a year together, had infinite studio time, and like ~200 versions of 90+ songs that was then practiced and curated into 13 songs. That is not happening now unless someone does it on their own dime.
Additionally, quite frankly most of the "pop stars", even the mass produced ones, until the 2000s were also pretty darn good musicians and songwriters in their own right, no matter if I liked their music or not. Now that number is less % wise.
The talent is still there, and there is a platform to be heard no matter if in Boston or Beirut... but there are not the incentives, rarely the money, and not as many listeners to make it common.
A big single, a tour and merch sales are more valuable to a band than an insanely great album... and can rinse and repeat that ~3 times over in 2 years. Which is probably about the same time to write, rehearse, record and release a good album with just intermittent touring. (ofc some artists just have insane periods of productivity and defy that whole rule... The Stranglers in the late 70s for example with an album every 8 months or so. (but it took a lot of drugs and coming into the industry with a 3 year backlog of songs, and basically a blank cheque from United Artists.)
Just my observations. I am not a professional and have really a second hand view of it. My brother would for sure be more interesting to ask and almost certainly would say some of this is completely wrong haha. (but that is just who he is, even if I was 100% right! Haha)