tenken00
Oh it's going down in Chinatown
- Jan 29, 2010
- 9,906
- 10,148
Ok... that was actually a nice drive by Allen. Especially that 4th down. I'll give it to Allen there.
Ok... that was actually a nice drive by Allen. Especially that 4th down. I'll give it to Allen there.
Yeah, nice drive no doubt. But can't help notice that Allen is very slow to throw the ball. By the time he throws, corner has already reduced the gap between him and receiver.
The failure rate of QBs taken in the first round of the draft says otherwise. Those guys tend to get rushed in with minimal development, and it's the group that fails the most despite having the most talent. It's the QBs who aren't rushed who tend to succeed at a higher rate.
This was one of the worst possible destinations for someone like Haskins. I've been adamant about this since he was picked.
I wasn't that high on him last year, but he really has put it together this year. It was a good trade up and a good pick.I love Sweat. Should have just taken him at 15 last year.
That data is misleading because of the teams they get drafted by. If you can have a QB sit it’s a later pick and the team is more established and run better. A rookie thrown into a starting spot is usually a crappy team and crappy coaches. That hurts development more than getting game snaps. Don’t forget Haskins didn’t start right away either.
What was the difference between Rosen and Murray in Arizona? One was a fraud and one wasn’t. Rosen wouldn’t have develped into a stud if he wouldn’t have started for two years. The player and coaches/team is what effects the development more than what year you get your first game snaps.
Holy cow fuller
I don’t think he got both feet in before his elbow hit out of bounds but that was great effort.
It's this whole slate of games. Maybe the IND/CIN game looks interesting (and who would've thought that would be a sentence somebody would type?)Anyone else find this game extremely boring?
Anyone else find this game extremely boring?
You're accidentally arguing in favor of my assertion.
I asserted that a QB being able to sit and learn is better than rushing them in. You're arguing the same thing.
Letting a QB have time to develop flat-out gives them the highest chance of success. Rushing them in before they're ready maximizes the chances of failure.