Any one ever been a benefactor of huge puck bid? I keep seeing someone is paying 30,000 pucks for bronze contracts
either loaning a friend pucks or settling an off-game bet/trade/sale
That's sad. Especially considering this is an annual game. Why bother doing that for a game that has an expiration date? If it were something like League of Legends I'd get it... but not NHL.
That's sad. Especially considering this is an annual game. Why bother doing that for a game that has an expiration date? If it were something like League of Legends I'd get it... but not NHL.
Agreed and think about it these low lives make 20 accounts and complete Tampa Bay they get 1.2 mil for moving it around. Unreal that EA has not addressed it.
I mean I'd get it as in I'd understand why some people would bother to do it. But this? Just doesn't make any sense.I still wouldn't get it
Is it that surprising though? EA doesn't care. They're just happy that they get money from people who pay for pucks. I'm sure for every one person that puts the time in this sad ********, there are ten people who frown upon this behaviour and just spend $10 on packs, because they couldn't be ****ing bothered.Agreed and think about it these low lives make 20 accounts and complete Tampa Bay they get 1.2 mil for moving it around. Unreal that EA has not addressed it.
Silly question, but why not just sign him, and then trade him immediately after? That's what I'd always do. Even though your GM rep drops, it doesn't take long before it rises again. I reached my Legendary GM status after 1200 games, so I think I'll start another GM playthrough, and make the team a little more realistic this time around. The team I built is so good that it's not that fun anymore.So Matteau thinks hes better the Reid Boucher who lead the league in goals last year. Anyone takes the time to develop him he turns out as a good 2line player. However at 86overall and wanting over 7million a year he can walk. So make sure you trade his ass when you can
Silly question, but why not just sign him, and then trade him immediately after? That's what I'd always do. Even though your GM rep drops, it doesn't take long before it rises again. I reached my Legendary GM status after 1200 games, so I think I'll start another GM playthrough, and make the team a little more realistic this time around. The team I built is so good that it's not that fun anymore.
It's hilarious how certain teams become your rivals if you keep trying to get a trade to go through for that team. St. Louis and Colorado should not be the Devils rivals, even if I did fleece them in multiple trades.
The back edge (and a large amount of the back of the case) is destroyed. The discs are fine, but as a collector that little damage upsets me.
Ah well. Not the end of the world I guess. I just don't want it to occur too often. Especially since I'm already paying over $30 for shipping to begin with.Ohhh, I didnt see your link at first. I'm the same way. Even if the game plays fine, you bought a brand new game and deserve a perfect case.
Ew. I said it before, and I'll say it again. The next gen is quite simply not impressing me that much right now. I just don't see the point in buying a $400/$500 console for some higher frame rates and more textures. Is anybody else underwhelmed by the next gen right now or am I paranoid?
The only good to come out of the next gen consoles is that when games are ported to PC, they'll be a lot more impressive, and it should be easier since they're all around equal footing right now (at least in comparison to the current gen consoles and PCs today). So that's a good thing. The only reason to stick with console gaming are the first party games. And it'll be a good 6 months before any substantial ones hit the market. I really hope people aren't pressured by the whole "OMG NEW TECHNOLOGY MUST GET IT DAY ONE OR I WILL NOT FIT IN WITH MY FRIENDS ANYMORE!" mentality.Being a PC owner, the consoles are just introducing things that have been around for 5+ years. im not an elitist by any means, but alot of people are saying console is up to par now. I mean ok, BF4 looks pretty similar on PS4 and PC, but give it 3-6 months and PC steams ahead again, especially as more 4K monitors roll out at better prices. to be honest though, if you are sitting 6-8 feet away from your TV, running a game at 1440x900 on a console isnt going to make any real visual difference. its still gonna look fine compared to full 1080p. a PC monitor 1-2 feet away from your face is another story
im actually having a crappy weekend since my BF4 copy didnt show up yet . would have bought it digital but got a boxed cpy ordered for my birthdat and hasnt come
Being a PC owner, the consoles are just introducing things that have been around for 5+ years. im not an elitist by any means, but alot of people are saying console is up to par now. I mean ok, BF4 looks pretty similar on PS4 and PC, but give it 3-6 months and PC steams ahead again, especially as more 4K monitors roll out at better prices. to be honest though, if you are sitting 6-8 feet away from your TV, running a game at 1440x900 on a console isnt going to make any real visual difference. its still gonna look fine compared to full 1080p. a PC monitor 1-2 feet away from your face is another story
The only good to come out of the next gen consoles is that when games are ported to PC, they'll be a lot more impressive, and it should be easier since they're all around equal footing right now (at least in comparison to the current gen consoles and PCs today). So that's a good thing. The only reason to stick with console gaming are the first party games. And it'll be a good 6 months before any substantial ones hit the market. I really hope people aren't pressured by the whole "OMG NEW TECHNOLOGY MUST GET IT DAY ONE OR I WILL NOT FIT IN WITH MY FRIENDS ANYMORE!" mentality.
every time I think about Star Citizen I have to change my underwear