Podkolzin's lack of production so far in 2020-21 is definitely concerning. As much as we can point the finger to his lack of ice time, being stuck behind older guys while playing for a coach who supposedly loves his veterans etc. eventually he has to put up numbers if he's to become who we want him to be. At some point talent pulls through - the cream rises to the top in spite of everything else.
Another issue is the lack of context surrounding his stats. We know for guys in the CHL that ideally you want to see them put up well north of 1.0 PPG in their D+2 season for them to maintain good odds of developing into an NHL top 6 forward. But what about in Russia? Take a look at this for instance:
View attachment 373135
Above are the respective PPG for all Russian forwards drafted over the last 15 years who played at least their D+2 season in the RSL/KHL (this is also sorted by D+2 from highest PPG to lowest).
Obviously even a quick glance would tell you that the higher your PPG, the better the chances of you succeeding. Bona fide stars like Malkin, Tarasenko and Kuznetsov all scored well over 0.8 PPG in their D+2 season. Now I don't think anyone here expects Pod to turn out to be that calibre of player, so what about just top 6 forwards in general? That would include guys like Zherdev, Frolov, Buchnevich, Kulemin, Dadonov and Gusev who all range from PPG's of 0.2 to 0.78 with an average of 0.52.
Looking at where Pod is ranked doesn't exactly inspire confidence either. Other than Gusev, the closest comparables in terms of his PPG are all guys who flamed out and never made it. To me, ideally you're looking for him to produce somewhere in the range of 0.4-0.6 to start feeling better about his chances as the bucket of comparable players gets better as PPG increases. Would it be fair to use 0.5 as a rough baseline for what to expect from him in 2020-21?