I agree Erhoff is really good and I was looking at him. But he's old.
He's 31 years old...that's like 2 years older than Phaneuf.
There are many defenseman that play till they are 38.
Heck, we'll probably be re-signing Phaneuf to play till 37.
I agree Erhoff is really good and I was looking at him. But he's old.
Vanek is the #1 thing we don't need.
Nothing against him, but we have a plethora of wingers here.
And to answer your question, they probably asked for something around Gardiner, which is why they even offered him in the division.
31s not ancient but it's past prime. He's going to be getting worse from now on while we need to get better. This probably isn't our year to win it all.He's 31 years old...that's like 2 years older than Phaneuf.
There are many defenseman that play till they are 38.
Heck, we'll probably be re-signing Phaneuf to play till 37.
what are the cap implications if we retires early?
what are the cap implications if we retires early?
We don't need more wingers or a cap hit like Vanek's, no surprise Nonis hung up on Regier.
i cant imagine nonis giving up the equivalent of moulson, 1st, 2nd.
we need to have a solid team from top to bottom, not just make an all star team.
This makes me extremely happy when I see our fans write this. Again no capspace for a Stastny or a Vanek on this team.
What we need is a Seidenburg type defenceman to our roster.
I agree Erhoff is really good and I was looking at him. But he's old.
Man, he'd be perfect.
31s not ancient but it's past prime. He's going to be getting worse from now on while we need to get better. This probably isn't our year to win it all.
I wonder whom were the Leafs scouting last night in Buffalo. Ehrhoff?