Fatass
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 22,247
- 14,161
Six more years of this guy’s stink on our team.OEL was Jim's one last FU to the city of Vancouver.
Six more years of this guy’s stink on our team.OEL was Jim's one last FU to the city of Vancouver.
We needed a loss. First test to see how the team responds under the new regime! I'm excited for what's to come!
Six more years of this guy’s stink on our team.
Consider a lot of people here wanted to sign him long term. this contract isnt looking bad at all. We all knew he was going to get 7 mill
Good thing hes on a very short contract with no NMC
Was always a shit deal and I love Garland.
It’s going to take 15+ years to rid the team of the Benning mess. It’s friggin’ crazy that guy will effectively screw up our club for that long. That’s pretty much one full generation of fans with no interest in the Canucks. Very bad for business.It’s the term AND the cost. It’s going to cost Boeser. Benning f***ed us for another decade.
It’s going to take 15+ years to rid the team of the Benning mess. It’s friggin’ crazy that guy will effectively screw up our club for that long. That’s pretty much one full generation of fans with no interest in the Canucks. Very bad for business.
How many kids follow the Canucks? Not nearly so many as did a decade ago. Add another six years to losing young fans, and there won’t be hardly any left, except for the hardcore hockey players. I can see the Canucks heading to a very dark era, much like the Lions are in now. And it’s thanks to Jim Benning.Hockey has generally always been like that. It’s unique compared to other sports. In the NFL the 30th team can be the 4th best team in literally 1 off season. It’s happened many times. In soccer , same thing. Basketball as well, couple good trades and the entire next year is different. In hockey , you lock up your team for a decade with 4-5 bad moves. That’s where we are. Some reasons are
*
A few months ago you were complaining that the contract was too short and that Benning should have left room to offer him more money.Giving EP40 7.25M was a giant blunder on his way out too.
Even if he bombs this season Petey has value and only 2 years left. OEL has negative value because of his contract.A few months ago you were complaining that the contract was too short and that Benning should have left room to offer him more money.
What does this have to do with anything?Even if he bombs this season Petey has value and only 2 years left. OEL has negative value because of his contract.
I was responding to Johnny and quoted your post by mistake.What does this have to do with anything?
This game solidify your stance? Interestingthis game solidifies my stance that we need to trade miller and horvat for prospects. yes they are our best players and on the best contracts, which is why we should take advantage of that situation to help us get over the edge later. we wont be winning anything as is and little room to add in free agency
Consider a lot of people here wanted to sign him long term. this contract isnt looking bad at all. We all knew he was going to get 7 mill
I understand how his early play got him there have no issues has great talent but 7 is a lot and considering the criticism a Pearson gets for less EP has to produce way better to expect less criticism.
Some people in the Canucks forum are like watch out Tampa. We have shaken off the rust now lol.
I am not saying it’s impossible because Boston somehow stomped them recently. Highly unlikely though especially with Kucherov and Point back.
OEL basically replaces Edler guys.
cause we all thought Edler at over 7 million a year was a fair deal for a player like him