Chet Manley
Registered User
OK I just read he paid back a portion of his signing bonus. Dude had to pay them to leave lol. Was he threatened by a guy with a shovel and bag of lye?
If the relationship was over for whatever reason him, the proper thing would have been to trade him as long as it didn't hurt the team. AKA negative value/max %50 retained. Any other 30 year old player would have gotten a chance to be picked up on waivers and extend his NHL career. Any way out the VGKs had via trade would have been better than paying a portion of the contract through the waiver rules. Totally classless from the outside looking in. If he wasn't behaving the way they wanted, terminate the SPC and move on.
If the relationship was over for whatever reason him, the proper thing would have been to trade him as long as it didn't hurt the team. AKA negative value/max %50 retained. Any other 30 year old player would have gotten a chance to be picked up on waivers and extend his NHL career. Any way out the VGKs had via trade would have been better than paying a portion of the contract through the waiver rules. Totally classless from the outside looking in. If he wasn't behaving the way they wanted, terminate the SPC and move on.