Incubajerks
Registered User
Eysseric is talented, but way too inconsistant. Can shoot from anywhere, nice passing, but the guy is a phantom certain games and is often injured.
He'll fit right in then...
Eysseric is talented, but way too inconsistant. Can shoot from anywhere, nice passing, but the guy is a phantom certain games and is often injured.
He's not. He's quite obviously weaker than the top academy players but he'll benefit a lot from being there.
Oh, I don't think he'll be at that level. But he will be on the men's national team. May be a player that could play in the lower 1/3 of the Premier League, or at least Championship.
England blew the doors off Italy, first time any England squad in ANY WC event has made the finals since 1966.
"Golden Generation" 2.0?
Only these guys actually might win something
Curiously I looked at their 2009 U21 finals team and outside of Joe Hart, James Milner and Theo Walcott nobody else really stepped up to a consistent international career (I guess you can include Danny Rose as well who is just breaking into the NT picture)
success at the u20 world cup doesnt mean a team will become sensational.
Go and look at the past winners/finalists and see how many players turned out to be great.
Saying golden generation 2.0 is putting unnecessary pressure on them
That guy in parentheses is one of the best left-backs in the world.