Skinnyjimmy08
WorldTraveler
- Mar 30, 2012
- 22,509
- 11,986
The process is broken. RFAs are getting greedy.
RFAs aren't getting greedy, they're finally asking for what they are really worth. Players are at their peak during their RFA years. The system is backwards and too many teams have overpaid UFAs eating up their cap.
Maybe eliminate the Dec 1st deadline, basically if you're not there for game 1, you're out the year.
Not enough cap space to go around.
Players need to understand that imo
The issue is the players association would never go for this. Hence no changes
Its actually the opposite. With the new US TV contract on the horizon and a projected large increase in the cap, agents have been advising the RFA's to take bridge deals unless they are adamant about a long term deal. Mostly the team and fans want long term deals before the cap increases.Unless the player is adamant on it I think you have to go for the longer deals with Sanheim, TK, and Provorov. If this is true, 0/2
Pretty sure the poster you quoted was talking about it from the team perspective.Its actually the opposite. With the new US TV contract on the horizon and a projected large increase in the cap, agents have been advising the RFA's to take bridge deals unless they are adamant about a long term deal. Mostly the team and fans want long term deals before the cap increases.
The "system" is in transition where the money is flowing away from the older players to the younger players.
the "system" now pays people for past performance, but now RFAs want to be paid for performance as well, as opposed to traditionally being paid for potential previously.
Everyone wants to grab now, and unfortunately that just isn't feasible unless the cap is increased, or 'older' players start taking less. One of those outcomes is extremely unlikely.
Well older playes definitely need to start getting paid less. Paying someone through their 30s for their performances during their 20s was always foolishthe "system" now pays people for past performance, but now RFAs want to be paid for performance as well, as opposed to traditionally being paid for potential previously.
Everyone wants to grab now, and unfortunately that just isn't feasible unless the cap is increased, or 'older' players start taking less. One of those outcomes is extremely unlikely.
The best players are going to get paid regardless of age. Teams have to come to terms that they can't underpay a 90 pts scoring winger or a 25 min elite defenseman just because he's 22.
the "system" now pays people for past performance, but now RFAs want to be paid for performance as well, as opposed to traditionally being paid for potential previously.
Wholeheartedly agree. The other side of that coin is 'average' players need to understand they are going to get squeezed out at that point. This may be oversimplifying a bit, but If i only have $30 a week for lunch, and I spend $15 of it one day on a steak, that's going to mean I've got much less to spend on the other days of the week.
In a hard cap world, for someone to gain, someone else has to lose, unfortunately.
My personal observations, is that in the NHL cap world it's been the players in the middle that have been overpaid for a long time. I think they will be the group that will get squeezed. I'm thinking of players that are over 28 and make 4 to 5 million but aren't really elite at any one thing.
The Flyers are very much bound for cap problems. It'll be interesting next off-season to see what they do with Nolan Patrick.
everyone thought yzerman had dirt on kuch when he signed that bridge , it was also signed in october I believe for all the its taking too long for guys to sign crowdThe cap makes a difference, but this is basically what Kucherov signed for 3 years ago.
everyone thought yzerman had dirt on kuch when he signed that bridge , it was also signed in october I believe for all the its taking too long for guys to sign crowd
well it is still august so maybe more sign before october 11 or whatever it was ,Except.. he was the last big RFA that season to sign, it was only him and Gaudreau that held out.
This year it's literally 5x the amount.
The player has to agree to any contract, too. If the player isn't interested in a long term deal at their current rate, you can't force them to sign a long term deal now.Bridging Sanheim and Konecny is a waste because the Flyers aren't a contender now.
The player has to agree to any contract, too. If the player isn't interested in a long term deal at their current rate, you can't force them to sign a long term deal now.
Further still, even if the Flyers aren't cup contenders in 2019-20, they still have to be cap compliant in 2019-20. They have $13.4M in available cap space right now, but Konecny and Provorov are without contracts and they could still opt for a 23 man roster. If they were to give long-term deals to both TK and Provorov, that $13.4M could disappear awfully fast.
Is that running only 12 forwards? Because even with TK, you still need to add a healthy scratch forward (~$800K give or take). It would essentially offset Hagg's money, assuming the Flyers front office has the same distaste for Hagg that posters here have.8 and 6 for Provorov and TK on long term deals is fair-ish, and once Provorov signs, we're clear to dump Hagg for whatever we can get. Theres some cap math there that needs to take place (putting people in minors as paper transactions, etc), but its doable with some room to spare. It's been talked about pretty heavily on the boards.