Pretty meh until they get a top flight centre, and their potential forward group isn't all that impressive in general either. Not saying Suzuki is bad, but he's kind of like Turris; an ideal 1B centre. Decent defensive group, though a lot is riding on Hutson becoming a #1D, and he might never be defensively responsible enough to go about that role effectively beyond simply being a great offensive threat.
Yeah but you have to keep in mind that they only had 2 drafts in their current rebuild, and since these drafts are very recent, many of these rookies are still early in their development. The hope for us, their direct rival, is absolutely that some of them don't develop as good as expected but as of now, Hutson, Reinbacher, Mailloux and Roy are very high end prospects. But the problem is that Slafkovsky, Guhle and Barron are also still prospects
Then after all this, there is a bunch of quality prospects who could end up in something good (Engstrom, Beck, Harvey-Pinard, Kidney, Mesar, Farell, Dobes/Fowler, etc)
Their current pool is a lot better than ours, we have Greig and Kleven to maybe match up Roy and Mailloux but we have nothing to answer their other top prospects. Sure we are farther in our rebuild and the hope is that they never find the elite talent that we have (Stutzle, Sanderson, Chabot and Tkachuk) but for the rest they already match us more than enough
Suzuki vs Norris : I personally like Norris better for defense and goal scoring but Suzuki is by far the better playmaker and if you do a poll on the main boards, people will easily take him over Norris. Plus there's injury concerns with Norris while Suzuki is already an iron man.
Caufield vs Batherson : Goal scorer vs playmaker but Caufield is going to score 40+ goals per 82 games for a while. Bath needs to get back to pre-Dell injury to match him offensively. I believe Batherson can be more usefull overall though but not if he plays like last season. Everyone outside of here would also take Caufield
Dach/Newhook vs Greig/Pinto : that will be interesting to keep track, 4 intriguing young players, hard to say who will better overall but I have faith in our guys
Matheson vs Chychrun : Matheson is a bit older but gotta hope his progression from the last 2 years ends and he even regresses because he was really good last season with the Habs. Also gotta hope that Chychrun stops being so injury-prone
Harris vs Brannstrom : Brannstrom is better at the moment but Harris is one year younger and already has some good results. They are similar in many ways actually
Kovacevic vs Zub : JK is an analytical darling, hopefully his game doesn't translate in a bigger role. Advantage Zub for now who has proven he can face top competition on a regular basis
So it really comes down to them not being able to match Stutzle, Sanderson, Chabot and Tkachuk but in only 2 drafts and a firesale they already have a lot of potential. Keep in mind that we had 6 rebuild drafts and that we started with Karlsson, Stone, Duchene, Pageau, Brassard, Dzingel, Hoffman and they started with Toffoli, Chiarot, Lehkonen and Kulak. Not comparable.