We need a break from this teams 28 year culture of playing not to lose.
Savard and Demers were the last GM/ Coach tandem that played to win and iced a team like that. Playing a 200 foot game is wonderful, love it, but this team often is intolerant of the mistakes and defensive lapses that offensive minded players typically make. Good development means teaching a player when to turn it on, and when to play it safe, not to staple the guy to the bench for a mistake.
Demers talked about how he had to be gentle with the young guys because he didnt want them not playing up to their talent out of fear of making mistakes. What a joke, guys like Martin, MT especially were exact opposites of that approach. i will go with Demers.
So I dont know if all these GMs and coaches we have had since Demers and Savard all went to the same school of " Dont Lose Hockey", but enough is enough. If that is the only school in Quebec, then yeah, need to look elsewhere.
Oh, and playing not to lose hockey is boring as hell to watch, and guess what, you never "win" a Cup, because you dont "win" a Cup by "not losing", as shown by 28 years of garbage , with like 2-3 years where " not losing " got us as far as we could go. Against the Rags we put Vanek on the 4th line when we couldnt score. I know the guy was having problems, but you had to play the guy top 6 and just hope he would turn it on , you had to if you wanted to win, but MT drops him to 4th line, what an idiot. And the brilliant run under Martin was 90% Halak and hoping we would score off turnovers and the PP. Remember Martin scribbling all the time? " Halak arrete la rondelle" , thats all he wrote, 1000 times each game.
Time for a change.