Your limiting yourself to free agents. I realize Holland has extreme trouble making anything but simple straight forward trades. But even you must admit 3 or 4 teams made it plain as day they were open for business. Philly ...Noah Cates upcoming RFA was available early june and even early July. Could Briere made it any more obvious that deals for prospects and picks were available.
Also Montreal and Winnipeg and San Jose were all open to ideas.
Philly has Morgan Frost, Sean Couturier, Scott Laughton...they very likey dont/didnt want to have a guy like Cates playing 4C. One of these four will end up playing wing.
1) Noah Cates being unsigned and Noah Cates being available are two very different things. Do you have any evidence of the latter? Why is Briere needing to move on from a drafted and developed 24 year old that just excelled in his sophomore season?
2) Again... it may be logical that Philly moves on from one of those C's, but unless you have evidence to the contrary it's just pure speculation on your part.
As a general point, if the standard is "any player in the league might be available and nothing was consummated", that's a pretty broad paddle to be beaten with.
Holland has turned over 18 of 22 roster spots since he joined 4 years ago. Only McD, Drai, Nuge and Nurse remain... literally EVERY other position has been replaced and I'd argue improved, with the exception of 4RD (Larsson).
And I know it doesn't sound like it, but I'm NOT defending him and I don't think he should be done... nor do I expect he is done with this roster... Rome is not built in a day and there are salary cap constraints which would steer you to make some of your improvements AT THE DEADLINE rather than all of them in the summer.
I think it is entirely unreasonable to suggest that he has been inactive, or that the roster at Aug 17th should be or will be the same as the roster on April 30th. It never has been, why would we start now?