I can't wait for July 1st. We're trading Ryan to Vancouver for Eriksson.
Not only does Loui fit the team chemistry better on and off ice, but his contract is down right stupid. 6 million dollar cap hit, 1 and 2 million dollars actuall salary.
Contracts like Loui's and Boedker's are going to help us to pony up for Stone, EK and Duchene (later Chabot and #4).
I'm not sure if I would do this trade but I also wouldn't be opposed to it. I think Ryan is a better player than Eriksson when he's on his game and healthy. (When they both are healthy and rolling I should say) I really hate Ryan, but I legitimately think he's better than Eriksson even if it's not by a big margin. Ryan has that extra gear in him when he's on and he can be the best player in a certain game but Eriksson doesn't have that. I guess the way I would put it is when Ryan plays with confidence he's easily better than Eriksson but that happens only in short spurts or rarely ever happens. Ryan also plays a lot better against western conference teams and would be a good fit for Vancouver following that logic. Vancouver has been extremely bad in the last two seasons, Eriksson would likely play better with a Duchene/ Stone than he did with pre-retirement Sedins and Horvat IMO.
Eriksson is injured just as much as Ryan and they provide similar production so the value is similar.
Ultimately that saves us a bit of money and we don't really downgrade much. Eriksson could surprise and rebound with us and Ryan would be a better fit for Van.
It's a type of deal where it's not like we gain much, but we don't give up much either so .. why not go for the change of scenery I guess but for anyone thinking we'd be better because of it.... well that's not likely to happen.