Proposal: Trade Proposals
- Thread starter King Weber
- Start date
- Status
I'd empty the register for a signed Stone. I would do Tolvanen, Fiala and our 1st.
Bringer of Jollity
Registered User
Sens are a team going into an extreme rebuild. I don't think any of those pieces really moves the needle. Nothing that helps the build for a competitive team 4-5 years down the road except the late 1st.
I'm not wanting to dump Bonino just cause. It was solely based on the if we could get Duchene and sign him long term. Say if he signs an extension at 8 per then I think Bonino would be a player you could get rid of at a 4 million dollar cap hit. It was all hypothetical if we got Duchene though. Just looking at it cap wise. Sissons Hartman and Fiala are gonna get a raise this year and I just think in that senerio where we get Duchene and sign him Turris and Bonino would probably need to get moved
King Weber
Registered User
- Apr 9, 2015
- 4,594
- 1,547
Preds reporters on twitter seem to be obsessed with landing Simmonds lately. He's a 30 year old power forward looking for a payday. A bad combination if you ask me. Last thing we need on this team is a Lucic-like contract.
He's also been good at screening the goalie lately.
Roman Yoshi
#164303
If we could get Duchene for Sissons and a 1st it would've been done two weeks ago.
Personally, I don't want Simmonds only because of age and wear the kind of game he plays. I think he would be a lot better than most of our forward options though.
If Philly really wants to blow the entire thing up, Giroux or Voracek would also look good. Contracts are a little harder to balance out without sending money the other way.
Personally, I don't want Simmonds only because of age and wear the kind of game he plays. I think he would be a lot better than most of our forward options though.
If Philly really wants to blow the entire thing up, Giroux or Voracek would also look good. Contracts are a little harder to balance out without sending money the other way.
Paranoid Android
mug mug mug
- Sep 17, 2006
- 13,008
- 412
I don't see Poile going after Duchene. If he wanted Duchene, we'd have him now instead of Turris.
Rental cost will be sky high and he probably wants to test free agency.
Rental cost will be sky high and he probably wants to test free agency.
Gnashville
HFBoards Hall of Famer
Tolvanen, Carrier/Allard, + 1st for Stone or Duchene.
FYI: DO NOT Trade Colton Sissons!! just don’t do it.
FYI: DO NOT Trade Colton Sissons!! just don’t do it.
I'm a big fan of Sissons, but, in certain situations he should certainly be available.
- Aug 13, 2007
- 35,477
- 15,752
Eklund(I know!) Says we are interested in Hagelin.
That does seem like a typical Poile deadline move.
All of you thinking we will make some big in season trade that costs us multiple players are gonna be disappointed
That does seem like a typical Poile deadline move.
All of you thinking we will make some big in season trade that costs us multiple players are gonna be disappointed
I don't mind a lesser move for depth. He has been hurt all year from the looks of it. Can we play Grimaldi, Hagelin, and Arvy just for fun
Gnashville
HFBoards Hall of Famer
He just is one of those guys that has more value than the stats show. Trading him is one of those trades that teams regret for years.
Last edited:
Scoresberg
In Trotz We Trust?
An LW would suit our lineup better but if we were to get Simmonds:
Forsberg - Johansen - Arvidsson
Hartman - Turris - Simmonds
Fiala - Sissons - Smith
Watson - Bonino - Jarnkrok
Grimaldi
If we got someone like Hagelin, then I'd swap to 2nd and 3rd lines, move Hartman to RW and the new guy to the left wing. Fortunately, TDL is far away, and we probably will get Turris back before that and try different combinations.
Good news are, JOFA is still as good and Sissons sticks with any line he has a chance with, Fiala is finding his game and Smith will put up 20+ goals again. We do need to find a better spot for Hartman, we need to utilize him better.
That 4th line would be one hell of a shutdown line and could provide some offense as well. X - Turris - Hartman should make up for a solid middle-6 line as well if they find the chemistry. I think Turris is the X factor here, if he can find his old self we will be much better off.
Forsberg - Johansen - Arvidsson
Hartman - Turris - Simmonds
Fiala - Sissons - Smith
Watson - Bonino - Jarnkrok
Grimaldi
If we got someone like Hagelin, then I'd swap to 2nd and 3rd lines, move Hartman to RW and the new guy to the left wing. Fortunately, TDL is far away, and we probably will get Turris back before that and try different combinations.
Good news are, JOFA is still as good and Sissons sticks with any line he has a chance with, Fiala is finding his game and Smith will put up 20+ goals again. We do need to find a better spot for Hartman, we need to utilize him better.
That 4th line would be one hell of a shutdown line and could provide some offense as well. X - Turris - Hartman should make up for a solid middle-6 line as well if they find the chemistry. I think Turris is the X factor here, if he can find his old self we will be much better off.
Porter Stoutheart
We Got Wood
- Jun 14, 2017
- 14,927
- 11,329
Disagree. We have other assets that don't make any current impact to our team that should have good enough market value to move those instead. There should not be any deadline rental situation where we consider giving up Sissons. Especially this year, where it seems like there might be a relatively wide variety of players available at the deadline... we shouldn't ever end up stuck dealing with a team that just irrationally demands Sissons be part of a deal because we can just flip our interest to a different player on another team and keep Sissons out of it all.
AtlantaWhaler
Thrash/Preds/Sabres
- Jul 3, 2009
- 19,713
- 2,935
I truly hope we don't make any moves other than a 4th line depth and/or 3rd paring depth trade. When everyone is healthy, this team really is awesome. Don't mess with that.
predfan24
Registered User
- Jul 12, 2006
- 5,105
- 962
Zuccarello is a guy I could see Poile being interested in. I've thought all year that the forwards could use a playmaker after JOFA. He would likely cost a first though. It will be interesting to see if Poile is willing to deal his first again this year.
I realize it is a complete pipedream but I would 100% trade Turris + for a signed Duchene. Turris has not fit well here IMO.
I realize it is a complete pipedream but I would 100% trade Turris + for a signed Duchene. Turris has not fit well here IMO.
Porter Stoutheart
We Got Wood
- Jun 14, 2017
- 14,927
- 11,329
That's the nice thing about how this market at the deadline is shaping up... even if there are gaudy prizes like Panarin, Stone, Duchesne out there, and maybe they command a king's ransom, there also seem to be many very good "consolation prizes" potentially available... Zuccarello, Silfverberg, Nyquist for example. If Poile plays his cards right - and he usually seems to - I am very optimistic that we'll get a good player. And he had better be willing to deal his 1st again - this is Prime Window time, there is never going to be a more justifiable time to be willing to deal it.
zhok
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2018
- 231
- 73
Duchene is obviously better than Turris. Turris and the 2nd line are our weakest link right now.
That being said, I too am wary of Duchene's contract year production. He seems to be one of those guys who selectively plays hard. Our two highest players are already like that (Johanssen and PK); don't want to really add another 8m loafer for the long haul.
But yes, for the love of god, find a way to upgrade Turris.
zhok
Registered User
- Feb 10, 2018
- 231
- 73
That one time we got past the 2nd round I think our deadline acquisition was PA Parranteau.
GoldOnGold
Registered User
Roman Yoshi
#164303
Hagelin actually makes a lot of sense. A poor man's Duchene when Duchene plays wing.
Porter Stoutheart
We Got Wood
- Jun 14, 2017
- 14,927
- 11,329
Sure, Fiddler for a 4th or Parenteau for a 6th... and going further back there were worse deadline deals. But it was a different set of expectations and a different availability market I would say. After that playoff rise I think the expectations have changed for the 2018 and 2019 deadlines. The team is in a definite contender's bracket now for deals. And the market seems like it will have a lot more prominent players potentially available than in any year I can think of.
But sure, I didn't expect Hartman last year either. And while he has been useful this season, and I don't mind the deal, it wasn't what I was expecting last year. So anything can happen. I'm still going to be optimistic that the Preds trade their 1st and add a bigger piece, however. Bearing in mind that me being optimistic is not intended to be a guarantor of anything.
- Status
