Sterling Archer
Registered User
- Sep 26, 2006
- 22,976
- 13,449
We can but we'd have to move out some salary from the names I put at the bottom of the post.Not sure how we can afford that
We can but we'd have to move out some salary from the names I put at the bottom of the post.Not sure how we can afford that
i'm not the BIGGEST Boeser fan, but i don't know why Vancouver would consider this. Of course Montreal does this, he's still lock for 2 more years at a decent cap hit and then he's still RFA at 25 year, you can basicly lock him long term with barely no declining years.If we lost the play-in round and didn't win 1st overall, I would definitely consider moving the 9th overall pick for Boeser. He would add much needed goal scoring and he's only 23. Right now all we have is Caufield.
do you know what sheltering means?It was if we get Lafreniere... the idea was finding a center that could shelter him.
do you know what sheltering means?
Playing him with Kopitar and make him play against top oppossing lines every night is the contrary of sheltering a kid. Montreal has enough depth at LW and quality C to shelter Lafreniere without making him play with plugs. ( not that i think Lafreniere would need sheltering anyway. i would see him start on the third line for a couple of matches and then switch him with Suzuki for the rest of the year and give tough match up to Danault and Gallagher and who ever their LW will be cause i would see Tatar being traded.
Sheltering like how McAvoy played with Chara? I think Lafreniere is a good enough talent to be on any top line. But when the center is more mature like Kopitar and not guys like Suzuki, Domi, Kotkaniemi who are leaning to be mature centers? And no, I don't want Lafreniere playing with Danault.
Like do the Devils have good wingers to help shelter Hughes? Would Hughes jump forward quicker if he had a winger who had size/skating/skill and was mature like Kopitar?
I think you get my point but continue on with whatever you got stapled in your head.
That's Mentoring, the kid should be good enough to handle it. Yes Lafreniere is probably good enough to handle first line minutes with a good line mates, but that's still the opposite of sheltering a kid.
If we get lucky and draft Lafreniere, mark my words. There is going to be a huge conversation about protecting him and who his center is.
Couldn't it just be Danault? I don't see the need to have to staple him to Tatar and Gallagher all the time. Give Suzuki or KK a good offensive winger.
Sure, call it whatever you want. It don't change the fact that MacAvoy played top minutes with Chara and it could be both Sheltering and Mentoring. Don't be sensitive, you get my point in terms of who Lafreneire's center is if we draft him.
If we get lucky and draft Lafreniere, mark my words. There is going to be a huge conversation about protecting him and who his center is.
Sure, call it whatever you want. It don't change the fact that MacAvoy played top minutes with Chara and it could be both Sheltering and Mentoring. Don't be sensitive, you get my point in terms of who Lafreneire's center is if we draft him.
If we get lucky and draft Lafreniere, mark my words. There is going to be a huge conversation about protecting him and who his center is.
I doubt Kopitar puts the Habs on his 7 team trade list (just like I doubt Brodin signs a long term extension with the Habs) so it’ll have to be someone else.
Maybe run with:
The Danault line with Tatar and Gallagher and put Lafrenière with Suzuki and Drouin.
What other top (non-RFA) centres could the Habs target?
Since we’re in dreamland..
IMO Lafreniere & KK would make A formidable duo - throw in Armia as the veteran / calming presence to allow both to grow and develop chemistry.
Kopitar is just one option and I look to the Kings cause they appear to be heading into rebuild. I'm fully aware it has low probability and the point of it all is to find a center who is good on faceoffs, has size, skates, well and has skill. A lot to ask for but that's what I would be after and yes, I would consider trading Kotkaniemi. I think Kotkaniemi has huge gains to take in skating if he becomes a 1C. Possible yes.
Other targets could be Getzlaf. I would to say Eichel but were not getting a center in their prime.
Getzlaf is on the decline and has a NMC too. Another player who I can’t see waiving I to come to Montreal. Is Joe Thornton next on your list?
Not sure why the Habs need a centre going into their mid thirties and giving up premium assets to get him.
I don't have the option to all other GM's to inquire. But you get my point... those are the types of centers we need right now today. I'm not afraid of star centers that have production in the 60-80 pts range in their 30's. Crosby, Malkin, Kopitar, Tavares, Stamkos, Bergeron, Giroux, Backstrom, Getzlaf, are all in their 30's are just starting. You think they are going to turn into Carter or Staal quickly right?
Getzlaf has 1 year left and is 35. He does have a NMC yes. And maybe he is available, maybe not. I would look at many options to help find a center that fits better with Lafreniere. Danault is the only guy we have and my strategy would be for him to stay where he is with Tatar and Gallagher and to find more proven centers for Lafreniere to play with.
Lafreniere with Suzuki, Kotkaniemi, or even Domi sounds like for a 100% rebuilding team yeah. We are not that team with Price, Weber, Gallagher, Petry, and others. I think our fan base is guilty thinking our core after our vets are gone is going to be a contender.
An improved prospect pool to me is a great situation but I'm not going to ignore the top players we have right now, I'm going to cherry pick the guys we need and possibly trade others to get players to make our team better now, not later.
100% rebuilds are for fools cause for every team that hits, there are a half dozen that fall flat on their face. You have the right to ignore Price and Weber all you want. Don't jump on my back cause I'm looking at both vets and youth mixed in
I’m not advocating for a full rebuild. If they get Laf they have a lot of the pieces to build a great team for the future. A team that can be a long term contender. Not try and force a window around Price and Weber. I just think if the Habs get Lafrenière their future core in 3-4 years is better than the core now, with players like Weber, Danault, Gallagher, as complimentary pieces.
Building around Laf, Kotkaniemi, Suzuki, Caufield, Primeau, and Romanov is the way to go. Better that than having 35% of the salary cap tied up in players who are 35+ in a couple of years.
BTW all the players you listed have some kind of NTC or NMC. Anyone you would target that doesn’t have that and is not a RFA?
If you get Lafreniere, I do believe we should be aggressive at finding a center for him to play with... during the Weber 3 or 4 year window and during Lafreniere's 3 year ELC. I don't support staying conservative if we get Lafreniere.
Not many C's out there. Kopitar and Getzlaf are the only two I think are more probable than a guy like Eichel. It won't be easy to get a center like Kopitar even if they are 33 next season. Your not going to be able to pull that off without digging deep in the prospect pool.
Not looking for a Seguin type. Looking for a Tavares, Bergeron, Kopitar, Getzlaf type. Too bad we didn't trade Poehling+ for ROR eh (in hindsight). That's what I'm talking about in terms of being too conservative cause we have a top 5 prospect pool.
Flyers dug deep in cap hit to sign Hayes and it was not all about points with them. They even have Nolan in the pipeline. Dealing with injuries but they are not going to ignore Giroux and Voracek's window. Habs actually have better vets.
My point is all the top centres, even the older ones, are almost impossible to trade for. Some, like you listed, have NTC, NMC and some are just not available because they are in their prime and teams don’t trade those players. The best centres are typically draft and developed. The Habs have Suzuki and Kotkaniemi now who have the potential to be that 1-2 punch down the middle for the Habs in a few years. That is the Habs best bet in becoming a contender.
I also don’t believe there is a Weber/Price window with them as the Habs best players. And I don’t believe Lafrenière is going to be the huge difference maker in year one to change that.
If habs land Lafreniere in the draft , and Buffalo offers Eichel for him. Do you do it???
I realise the outcry this would generate , not the best PR move for the habs, but they 100% have to consider it.
I would in a heartbeat but I don't buy the hype around 1st overall , im sure he'll be good , but Jonathan Huberdeau type of good.
I can agree with trying to go for broke and getting a bona fida no. 1 center but I don't think either Getlaf nor Kopitar fit the bill. I'd 100% target Eichel, Barkov, PLD or someone else who's young and fit into the core of this team. Why ditch the ton of young assets it would take to land a no. 1 center for only a handful of productive years at best?If you get Lafreniere, I do believe we should be aggressive at finding a center for him to play with... during the Weber 3 or 4 year window and during Lafreniere's 3 year ELC. I don't support staying conservative if we get Lafreniere.
Not many C's out there. Kopitar and Getzlaf are the only two I think are more probable than a guy like Eichel. It won't be easy to get a center like Kopitar even if they are 33 next season. Your not going to be able to pull that off without digging deep in the prospect pool.
Not looking for a Seguin type. Looking for a Tavares, Bergeron, Kopitar, Getzlaf type. Too bad we didn't trade Poehling+ for ROR eh (in hindsight). That's what I'm talking about in terms of being too conservative cause we have a top 5 prospect pool.
Flyers dug deep in cap hit to sign Hayes and it was not all about points with them. They even have Nolan in the pipeline. Dealing with injuries but they are not going to ignore Giroux and Voracek's window. Habs actually have better vets.
I can agree with trying to go for broke and getting a bona fida no. 1 center but I don't think either Getlaf nor Kopitar fit the bill. I'd 100% target Eichel, Barkov, PLD or someone else who's young and fit into the core of this team. Why ditch the ton of young assets it would take to land a no. 1 center for only a handful of productive years at best?
If you're going to go for a no. 1 center better go for an established younger one that can grow and form chemistry with another young star than for years to come.