Dr Jan Itor
Registered User
Swapping Zucker and Trocheck is a lateral move, doesn't do much. Now you're just giving away Brodin.
Swapping Zucker and Trocheck is a lateral move, doesn't do much. Now you're just giving away Brodin.
There was a + attached to Trochek.
There’s also the little detail where you’re swapping one of the many expendable wingers we have going forward for a 26 year old top 6 center, which we have none of going forward.
It’s far from a “lateral move”
Brodin and Ek for Trocheck is a no-brainer for Guerin
The biggest issue for the Wild since they became the Wild was having top 6 centers. Trocheck is a 26 year old center that is on pace for nearly 60 points during a "struggling" year. That's simply worth more than Brodin and Ek.No it isn't; there is questions if Trocheck is going to trend back up (he's on pace for 16 goals this season). As well, losing Brodin hurts the depth of our defense (Soucy has been playing well, but remember when we lost Scandella and the defense had issues with depth). Not to mention how hard it's been for the Wild to get some decent checking line players. That was one of the biggest issues for Minnesota since Brodziak left and why Fletcher brought in Hanzel.
No it isn't; there is questions if Trocheck is going to trend back up (he's on pace for 16 goals this season). As well, losing Brodin hurts the depth of our defense (Soucy has been playing well, but remember when we lost Scandella and the defense had issues with depth). Not to mention how hard it's been for the Wild to get some decent checking line players. That was one of the biggest issues for Minnesota since Brodziak left and why Fletcher brought in Hanzel.
The biggest issue for the Wild since they became the Wild was having top 6 centers.
Trocheck is a 26 year old center that is on pace for nearly 60 points during a "struggling" year. That's simply worth more than Brodin and Ek.
Talking about it being hard to find grinders is just nonsense.
That might be the worst list of comparables I have ever seen. What are you possibly trying to say with the list of McCann, Rakell, Drouin, Strome, and Coyle?Since the Wild became the Wild having any type of center has been an issue.
In a vacuum, yes. Would you trade Brodin and Ek for Jared McCann? Rickard Rakell? Jonathan Drouin? Ryan Strome? Charlie Coyle?
Good grinders are hard to get. That's why the Wild traded for Hanzel. Also why the Wild had so many 3rd/4th line players. Stewart, Mitchell, Konopka, Rupp, Powe, Cooke, Carter, Veilleux, Fontaine, Mitchell - because you know they are so easy to find.
Trocheck is absolutely worth thatNo it isn't; there is questions if Trocheck is going to trend back up (he's on pace for 16 goals this season). As well, losing Brodin hurts the depth of our defense (Soucy has been playing well, but remember when we lost Scandella and the defense had issues with depth). Not to mention how hard it's been for the Wild to get some decent checking line players. That was one of the biggest issues for Minnesota since Brodziak left and why Fletcher brought in Hanzel.
The problem is I’d be shocked if he’s even availableTrocheck is a slam dunk IMO. We’re talking about a 26yo, right shot center who has scored 30 before. If he can pace for 60 points playing on the 2nd powerplay(that doesn’t get on the ice much in Florida) and playing with Brett Connolly and Malgin even strength, I’d call that a pretty good player. These are precisely the trades that we always pass up and then people are annoyed that we didn’t look into it. This is a guy who could easily turn into a 1B center type that puts up 70 points a year and people are freaking out about the prospect of losing our 4th best defensman and a grinder shooting at 2.5%.
That’s not my point. Nobody has any idea if he’s available or not. My point was more that fans keep drooling looking for a top 6 C, and then when someone proposes a deal for one we lose our minds. Looking at the O’rielly trade, we could’ve easily turned nino and our 1st into o’rielly, and nobody wanted to to it because it was way to much to pay for a “50 point center”. Instead we turned those pieces into Filip Johansson and Viktor RaskThe problem is I’d be shocked if he’s even available
Nobody has any idea if he’s available or not. My point was more that fans keep drooling looking for a top 6 C, and then when someone proposes a deal for one we lose our minds.
Looking at the O’rielly trade, we could’ve easily turned nino and our 1st into o’rielly, and nobody wanted to to it because it was way to much to pay for a “50 point center”. Instead we turned those pieces into Filip Johansson and Viktor Rask
Trading a center for a center doesn't somehow create a hole at center. If this specific idea makes a hole anywhere it's at LD. Again, running down the centers currently in the system:For every Ryan O'Reilly, you have a Ryan Johansen. I remember, what was it? Brodin + el Nino for Johansen? And Johansen hasn't exactly done wonders for Nashville - so much so, that they went out and grabbed Duchene, because Johansen has struggled. Furthermore, we look at trades in a vacuum. Right now, we have Koivu and Spurgeon out. Moving Brodin and Eriksson-Ek at the moment wouldn't be smart. Finally, the depth of this team really plays a factor.
Look at what Buffalo got for Ryan O'Reilly; Patrik Berglund, Vladimir Sobotka, Tage Thompson and a 1st round and a 2nd round pick.
Berglund quit hockey, Sobotka was a 30+ year old depth player and Tage Thompson was a decent prospect, but not something that the Blues could do without.
Look at what Matt Duchene returned at the deadline; a conditional 1st in 2019, 2020, Abramov and Davidsson. Yes, Duchene was a rental, but meh.
I'd be more than willing to trade Brodin OR Eriksson-Ek for Trocheck along with some other combination of prospects/players.
Honestly, I'd trade Brodin + Hartman/Foligno + someone like Boudrias/Firstov/Giroux + conditional 1st in 2020 + 2nd in 2021 for Trocheck.
Trading Eriksson-Ek also creates a bigger problem in the future; Staal and Koivu only have so many years, so we trade Eriksson-Ek and...? in 2022, we'd be looking for another Eriksson-Ek as Koivu and Staal are gone.
I suspect that the crux of this whole disagreement is whether or not Eriksson-Ek has the potential to fill that 2C hole going forward. That's something that some fans seem to see in him but, for the life of me, I don't. I wouldn't be disappointed to be proven wrong, though.
Kunin at center is an option, I just don't think it's a very good one personally.The crux of the disagreement isn't if Eriksson-Ek has the potential to fill in the 2C, but having an elite shutdown center for post Koivu. Fletcher didn't trade for Hanzel for his scoring prowess, he got him to pair up with Koivu to help shutdown opposing teams. Fletcher had problems filling the bottom 6 (regardless of what 2Pair has said). Eriksson-Ek is finally turning the corner and if he can become an elite shutdown center, that would solve Minnesota's issues for a while there. As for Kunin, why don't we move him and keep him at center? It'd solve two issues with one player. One, another center. Two, removes a winger.
Finally, there are some centers that are going to hit the free agent market that could be interesting options; Ryan Nugent Hopkins, Vladislav Namestnikov (though he's been moved to wing it appears), and even Brassard in a pinch. Trocheck had one good season and possibly another good season this season, but we'll see.
Kunin at center is an option, I just don't think it's a very good one personally.
Free agency is also an option, but I'm skeptical that it's better than pursuing a trade.
Regardless of whether or not filling the bottom-6 is easy, it will always be easier than filling the top-6. And while Ek is doing alright in a defensive role this year, I think superlatives like "elite" are pretty far over the horizon.
*It's probably worth reiterating that I don't think Trocheck is a realistic option, he's just a name to use as an example here. If there's some crucial flaw I'm missing with him specifically so be it, but the broader point remains the same.