With what's going on with Eichel and Reinhart I'd think the chances of moving Mittelstadt are about 0, but who knows?Isn't their a chance Casey M become available? Buffalo isn't going to want to pay hin
With what's going on with Eichel and Reinhart I'd think the chances of moving Mittelstadt are about 0, but who knows?Isn't their a chance Casey M become available? Buffalo isn't going to want to pay hin
How can one ignore his previous 400+ odd games in the NHL when he played wing for 90% of the time, and focus on his last 20 games, when he was playing C because the top two C's were out of the lineup? The guy has played RW in the vast majority of his time in the NHL - I would assume because that's where he is best. Nylander averages twice as many FO's per game as Reinhart, and most consider him a stretch at C.
Reinhart has 7 years under his belt in the NHL. He is not a kid. He is what he is. A good top 6 RW.
How can one ignore his previous 400+ odd games in the NHL when he played wing for 90% of the time, and focus on his last 20 games, when he was playing C because the top two C's were out of the lineup? The guy has played RW in the vast majority of his time in the NHL - I would assume because that's where he is best. Nylander averages twice as many FO's per game as Reinhart, and most consider him a stretch at C.
Reinhart has 7 years under his belt in the NHL. He is not a kid. He is what he is. A good top 6 RW.
Ignoring a players preferred position is what led to Guerin making a trade for MoJo. If you are willing to ignore virtually all of Reinhart's NHL career, and pretend that he will be a top 6C going forward, then you are a more optimistic guy than I am.No one in the debate is ignoring anything other than you ignoring that we have a glaring hole at center and Reinhart has potential to remedy that. We all know he has spent much of his career at wing. But if you're as starved for a top 6 center as we are, you explore all possibilities. What you don't do is argue it with career faceoffs when he is 25 years old. He has 6 years, not 7 years in the NHL by the way.
They won't have to. He's not going to cost over 1 million aav. Probably closer to 800kIsn't their a chance Casey M become available? Buffalo isn't going to want to pay hin
Ignoring a players preferred position is what led to Guerin making a trade for MoJo. If you are willing to ignore virtually all of Reinhart's NHL career, and pretend that he will be a top 6C going forward, then you are a more optimistic guy than I am.
The other thing about Reinhart is that he will be somewhat expensive to get, and expensive to retain. I am guessing that he will want around 6.5-7M long term if he has a good year while playing C(say 50-55 pts.). That's a lot to pay for a #2C.
Speaking so factually about something that is highly objective is being small minded. He has been more than a serviceable center this season, He is very young and still developing as a player. This would not be the first time a player started his career on wing and moved to center as he learned.
Reinhart's first three years in Buffalo their top 6 centers were Eichel and O'Reilly. It's not hard to see why he started his career on the wing. Thinking that he's locked into being a wing for good now because of that, is ridiculous.
reinhart is older than eichel.... his first year eichel wasnt even on the roster.
If only there was a way to fact check your statements before making themreinhart is older than eichel.... his first year eichel wasnt even on the roster.
Kap 8ish
Fiala 7ish
Zucc 6 (for now)
Reinhart 6-7ish?
Boldy 2 years until bump
Rossi 3 years until bump
It’s a lot.
which is the exact same thing johansson did... thinking situations are different are turning a blind eye. Johansson much like reinhart was drafted as a center, moved to wing, then back to center. now johansson is back at wing, thinking the same couldnt happen to reinhart is pure ignorance.
I could get behind this choice as an alternative plan. I still think he has upside, whereas I have no such hopes for guys like Rask, Bjugstad, and Bonino. I would imagine he would be an inexpensive acquisition? With really good defensive C's like JEE and Sturm, we can afford to gamble on offensive upside when it comes to a C. Would CHI consider a straight trade for Rask, or is that crazy talk?Dylan Strome continues to be on the radar as well. Rough year with a concussion and some healthy scratches, but he's got another year at $3.1m and will still be an RFA. Seems like a decent target if you want to keep the acquisition cost low and think he can regain some confidence between a good pair of wingers.
I do not recall seeing so many centers on the market in a summer. Eichel, Reinhart, RNH, Danault, Monahan, Nolan Patrick, both Stromes, maybe Barkov.
Time to clear the decks of cap space to be in a position to get one of those guys. Get Parise to Seattle despite the cost to do so. It is the right move.
I just cannot see parise on this team next year after how things ended this season.I do not recall seeing so many centers on the market in a summer. Eichel, Reinhart, RNH, Danault, Monahan, Nolan Patrick, both Stromes, maybe Barkov.
Time to clear the decks of cap space to be in a position to get one of those guys. Get Parise to Seattle despite the cost to do so. It is the right move.
Why would parise help wild
He has no reason to waive for rebuilding team, or leave his wife / kids
It's a 2 way street. It's not realistic. Parise, & his agent being pissed at wild is not going to lend any credence to him waiving, & accepting a trade