Confirmed with Link: [TOR/COL] Nazem Kadri, Calle Rosen for Tyson Barrie (50% retain), Alex Kerfoot trade (continued)

Status
Not open for further replies.

thewave

Registered User
Jun 17, 2011
40,268
10,154
Lol, you actually think Gardiner is a better defenseman after watching Barrie so far this year?

Depends how you look at a Dman. So far it's looked like he got us out of trouble and going the other way with more ease. We are talking healthy Jake here, not bad back Jake. Barrie got a lot of hype in Colorado, we'll see if the real Barrie game holds up to the scrutiny of a hockey market with the most hockey professionals per capita in the world.

You actually think you can tell anything from like 5 start of the season games? Lol
 

Tak7

Registered User
Nov 1, 2009
12,686
4,195
GTA or the UK
Depends how you look at a Dman. So far it's looked like he got us out of trouble and going the other way with more ease. We are talking healthy Jake here, not bad back Jake. Barrie got a lot of hype in Colorado, we'll see if the real Barrie game holds up to the scrutiny of a hockey market with the most hockey professionals per capita in the world.

You actually think you can tell anything from like 5 start of the season games? Lol

Not 5 games, no.

But from their overall body of work and performances?

I'm picking Barrie every time.

How people still defend Jake The Mistake around here is beyond me - flashy player who constantly struggled in his own end far more than he contributed up the ice. Not to mention he melted at just hearing the word PRESSURE
 
  • Like
Reactions: TopCheese

Leafs1991

Registered User
Nov 17, 2015
1,561
968
Depends how you look at a Dman. So far it's looked like he got us out of trouble and going the other way with more ease. We are talking healthy Jake here, not bad back Jake. Barrie got a lot of hype in Colorado, we'll see if the real Barrie game holds up to the scrutiny of a hockey market with the most hockey professionals per capita in the world.

You actually think you can tell anything from like 5 start of the season games? Lol

I know I said this year but I'd say these 5 games are indicative of what Barrie plays at all the time. I've seen him play for Colorado too and he was always a better defenseman than Gardiner, even before the injury. And that's coming from someone who's always liked Gardiner despite the big mistakes he makes.
 

meefer

Registered User
Jun 9, 2015
4,714
4,655
Bangkok
Neither Gardiner nor Barrie is special overall. However, both are much better than average. Attacking either is a muggs game. They both have flaws, but the sum of their parts is a benefit to every team in the league at the right price.
 

S E P H

Cloud IX
Mar 5, 2010
30,934
16,406
Toruń, PL
We probably won the trade on the 2nd component IF Rosen doesn't amount to much, or the same with the 3rd.
Avs fan here, Rosen outplayed at least three of our bottom defenders and was unfairly sent to the AHL simply due to his non-wavier status. Him and Timmins were easily the two best players for Avs during the preseason.

from what i've seen makar>>barrie

from organizational pov sakic's move is a win for the avs; dubas' moves are a fail IMO
I don't think that's fair, Barrie is a fantastic player. The problem with Tyson is he has some weird weaknesses which makes him a very polarizing player. When he played for us, there were games where he drove me head-against-a-wall crazy, which I concluded that he's just a streaky player; either everything goes right for him in two weeks of action and then everything falls apart. Because of that, he's part of the "pros have to outweigh the cons" type of player for me.

The one weakness which I don't understand is his passing skills for a player as good as he is. I mean he's better than Jordie Benn and Ceci type of defenders, no doubt, but his passing skills are very much below-average for an offensive calibre player of his stature. He failed in Roy's system (call him bad coach or good coach) which relied on breaking it out of the zone with passes, which he simply isn't good at. He is a puck-rusher at heart and needs that system to get the most out of him. Makar isn't as good as Barrie is in other categories such as shot, but Makar creams him in making crisp breakout passes.

Kadri with 1G 2A tonight
He won't be putting up three points every night, but he was much better when he wasn't scoring either. Some of those against the Caps was Holtby bringing out his inner Raycroft.

Could be. I thought Jake would get 6 and he pulls 4m. It's crazy, wasn't just me that said the 6 range but it could have been the non disclosure of medical records.
With all due respect, you're out to lunch bruv and not sure if it's on this planet. If Tyson Barrie would've signed a 5 to 6 million dollar contract...Avs wouldn't have traded him at all. Barrie is getting at least 8 million dollars minimum, he is a client of Newport and his exact agent is that of Ryan O'Reilly. Now I do think Leafs can make the room for Tyson, which will involve getting rid of Ceci and Nylander.
 

Nithoniniel

Registered User
Sep 7, 2012
20,913
16,749
Skövde, Sweden
How people still defend Jake The Mistake around here is beyond me - flashy player who constantly struggled in his own end far more than he contributed up the ice.
That's pretty easy, because there's simply no measurable way you can say his issues outweighed his strengths.

I'll drop the same argument I always do on this topic. If Jake was a liability defensively (or "constantly struggled in his own end" as you put it) then how come the opposition score relatively little against him every year for 7 years, regardless of what kind of minutes he played or what partner he had?

Until someone can answer that, I'll turn that statement around. I have no idea how anyone, considering the above, can still hold to the opinion that he is awful defensively and an overall detriment to his team?

Talking about folding under pressure, now there's a real argument.
 

Leafling

Registered User
Oct 24, 2015
503
182
Not 5 games, no.

But from their overall body of work and performances?

I'm picking Barrie every time.

How people still defend Jake The Mistake around here is beyond me - flashy player who constantly struggled in his own end far more than he contributed up the ice. Not to mention he melted at just hearing the word PRESSURE

So 5 games tell you Barrie will be better than Gards under pressure?

I like Barrie because we needed a more defensive minded D man, Gardiner was an overkill on offense as we have so many skilled wingers. Regardless, I would like to see a full season of Barrie to compare the contributions Gardiner has made to this team.
 

cookie

Fresh From The Oven
Nov 24, 2009
6,922
1,425
Oven then stomach
That's pretty easy, because there's simply no measurable way you can say his issues outweighed his strengths.

I'll drop the same argument I always do on this topic. If Jake was a liability defensively (or "constantly struggled in his own end" as you put it) then how come the opposition score relatively little against him every year for 7 years, regardless of what kind of minutes he played or what partner he had?

Until someone can answer that, I'll turn that statement around. I have no idea how anyone, considering the above, can still hold to the opinion that he is awful defensively and an overall detriment to his team?

Talking about folding under pressure, now there's a real argument.
Yeah, I don't get how people can talk garbage about Jake. How many points do they overlook?

Like his playing defense in front of goalies like Raycroft, Toskala, and Gustavsson?

Being partnered with Zaitsev and facing top tier forwards?

Having to compensate for relatively younger, less defensively conscious forwards throughout his entire Leafs' tenure?

Being relatively new to the position, having played wing through college, yet also being given the nickname "Silver"?

The easy answer to this is: he made mistakes because he was one of the few defenders on some very questionable Leafs teams that could move the puck. Other defenders make similar, if not worse, mistakes all the time. It comes with the position.
 

PAZ

.
Jul 14, 2011
17,396
9,764
BC
Wasn’t his rumoured ask 8?

Toronto would be the only team that could give 8 years.....

Josi (taxes) and Petro are supposedly being offered 8.25ish.

From a person who watches Barrie more than us.....
Where do you rank him as a ufa D?

I was hoping for 7.5ish x 8. Which would be about 60 million. A team would have. To offer 8.5 to beat that....

How much of a step down is Barrie compared to Josi and Petro?

Josi isn't going anywhere, Poile would give away half his team before letting Josi walk. The only way the Blues let Petro walk as well is if he's asking 10 mil. If either of those players hit UFA, they'll be closer to $10 mil than $8 mil.

But to answer the question, Barrie is worse than both of those players. However, Barrie is a less valuable to you guys since you already have Reilly, but to many other teams I can definitely see him being offered $8-9 mil, and if the other two hit UFA they'll be getting $9-10 mil.
 

DarkKnight

Professional Amateur
Jan 17, 2017
32,160
49,489
Im gonna say it, I havent been overly impressed with Barrie.

Yes, its October. Hopefully by April hes changed my mind. I also have only watched 4 of 7 games.

At this point if we had to sign one of the two UFAs but lose the other its Muzz.

Relative to expectations Kerfoot has looked much better then Barrie IMO
I agree. I take Muzz all day long at this point, without factoring in age and potential future decline. Barrie has been very underwhelming in our end so far. For my money Muzzin has been our best D man this year and he provides things we desperately need.
 

Leafsman

I guess $11M doesn't buy you what it use to
May 22, 2008
3,412
588
Im gonna say it, I havent been overly impressed with Barrie.

Yes, its October. Hopefully by April hes changed my mind. I also have only watched 4 of 7 games.

At this point if we had to sign one of the two UFAs but lose the other its Muzz.

Relative to expectations Kerfoot has looked much better then Barrie IMO
I forgot he played for us yesterday until during the third period I noticed "94" and was like "Who dat?" And remembered we traded for him.
 

DavePoulin4PM

2x NHL all star, Selke winner, NHL exec
Nov 6, 2017
1,570
2,229
That's pretty easy, because there's simply no measurable way you can say his issues outweighed his strengths.

I'll drop the same argument I always do on this topic. If Jake was a liability defensively (or "constantly struggled in his own end" as you put it) then how come the opposition score relatively little against him every year for 7 years, regardless of what kind of minutes he played or what partner he had?

Until someone can answer that, I'll turn that statement around. I have no idea how anyone, considering the above, can still hold to the opinion that he is awful defensively and an overall detriment to his team?

Talking about folding under pressure, now there's a real argument.


NHL GMs have already told you what they think of Jake. He hit free agency, sat there for awhile and got paid a very modest contract.

He gets paid $4 million a year for a reason.. and that’s because he is a flawed player.

There is no argument to be had. League executives have spoken.
 

Leafidelity

Best Sport/Worst League
Apr 6, 2008
37,885
7,953
Downtown Canada
Ive been quite impressed with Kerfoot. I really didn't know what to expect, but he's been a nice 3rd line center.

Barrie still seems unsettled. At best, he's been the quiet partner for Muzzin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SAMCRO44

Not My Tempo

Registered User
Feb 22, 2015
3,693
3,752
Toronto
I agree. I take Muzz all day long at this point, without factoring in age and potential future decline. Barrie has been very underwhelming in our end so far. For my money Muzzin has been our best D man this year and he provides things we desperately need.
I’d love to sign Muzzin, and then possibly trade Kapanen and clear up cap space to sign someone like Gudas. Fixes our D need next year and we’d probably also have enough room to resign Mikheyev, and we’d probably get a decent draft pick in return for Kapanen. If one of Woll or Scott is ready to take over once Andersen’s contract is up, that helps us out a ton going forward as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DarkKnight

Nithoniniel

Registered User
Sep 7, 2012
20,913
16,749
Skövde, Sweden
NHL GMs have already told you what they think of Jake. He hit free agency, sat there for awhile and got paid a very modest contract.

He gets paid $4 million a year for a reason.. and that’s because he is a flawed player.

There is no argument to be had. League executives have spoken.
Actually, most agree that it was because of the hazy conditions of his back injury, but nice appeal to authority.
 

Koolboss

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
3,175
1,130
Toronto
Ive been quite impressed with Kerfoot. I really didn't know what to expect, but he's been a nice 3rd line center.

Barrie still seems unsettled. At best, he's been the quiet partner for Muzzin.
Kerfoot has been decent for us but his FO% better improve soon at 46%
 

Merrrlin

Grab the 9 iron, Barry!
Jul 2, 2019
6,768
6,925
Kadri vs Kerfoot so far this season:

NameCF%D zone start%PP PointsEV Points
Kerfoot57.754.813
Kadri50%55.622
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

Similar stats. Kerfoot has more GP, but also less quality PP time. Kadri is producing better per game and looks like he will put up 10-15 points more, but part of that comes from PP opportunity.

To me they seem like pretty even players. Kadri will score more goals and has more to offer offensively, but Kerfoot can kill penalties, is younger and cheaper, and is only a slight downgrade offensively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: qqaz
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad