Dupree13
Registered User
Not to mention of course that the entire reason PK hasn't signed is that he's reportedly seeking Drew Doughty type money. It wouldn't be prudent for Shero to give that out right now.
I don't doubt it. I'm not sure enough of their needs to know what combo they'd want.
And, would they hang up because of the actual value that I proposed OR the need for atleast one established NHL talent?
I would absolutley love to have Subban here. Kid's got an attitude but he's a great player.
Not going to happend though, but one can dream.
Just imagine getting OEL here. Absolute pipedream but i would cry happy happy tears of joy if that would happend. Niskanen + 2/1 pick + prospect, eh eh eh?
GET IT DONE RAY JESUS WHAT'S TAKING SO LONG
I agree that this D group is a concern. I actually think they have the potential to be pretty terrible..
Let's say-- again leaving aside the WHY question-- that MTL explores moving Subban. What's their price?
Is Nisky, Despres, and Pouliot the type of return they'd be seeking? More? Less? A different combo of players/prospects/positions?
I don't want Suban for two reasons:
1.) He wasn't very good last year.
How many of our defensemen were good last year? And Subban was a product of the total debacle in Montreal last season. I've seen him play live many times now. He has franchise defenseman written all over him. It's just that for whatever reason, people have a hate-on for him.
Fair enough. But what has he done to deserve Drew Doughty money? There are more affordable, and frankly better guys out there to get for top 4.
And his reputation of slew footing would make him less attractive to other GMs.
I agree that this D group is a concern. I actually think they have the potential to be pretty terrible.
Even Letang I'm not sure of. While he's obviously got a ton of ability, I'm not sure if he has enough upstairs to be the rock solid #1 that we're looking for him to be. And someone said they saw leadership traits in Tanger...I really don't see that at all.
Yeah...it's also been noted that Letang didn't seem quite the same last year after coming back from his multiple concussions (yeah...remember that?) so that's something to keep an eye on as well.
That's one of the interesting things going in here. I could see our D being pretty good (not great) all season, or a real cluster. Will depend some on systems and the Coach being able to adapt, and on Martin being paired with someone that takes the responsibility of being physical off his shoulders / frees him up to move the puck with reckless Bylsma-abandon, and on one of Bortuzzo or Despres really stepping up and not missing a beat as a rookie.
I want a big mean crease clearing and protecting D-Dman.
Agreed. While not quite the mean punishing D, I'm still in love with Hejda. Pair him with Martin for a shutdown role, as Martin can play solid defensive hockey when not being forced into an up tempo game that's not quite his style.
There's a guy possibly available, a guy that I'm guessing everybody hates on this board. A guy who could instantly become Letang's rival in total ice time. A guy who could pair with Letang perhaps, be both a shutdown D-man and an offensive catalyst. A guy who is more physical than Letang, just as mobile and a royal pain to play against. A guy who (if paired with Letang) could turn our first pairing into a Suter-Weber 2.0 situation. The only caveat is Letang would have to play the left side, but he may have to do so even without this guy.
I'm talking about P.K. Subban. I know most people feel he's not a "Pittsburgh" guy, or whatever. But he's a really good D-man. Plays in every situation. Would bring back some attitude that this team has lacked for a while.
Maybe it's just me, but I'd let Orpik/Martin be the shutdown pairing. Have some form of Niskanen/Despres/Strait/Bortuzzo/Engelland form your third pairing that can handle 15+ minutes in posteason hockey. And go after a dynamic offensive D-man like Boyle to pair with Letang at ES and on the PP. That type of D-man, you won't have to worry if he fits our system and can get Letang out of the D-zone.
Well, replacing the last czech we paired with Martin for that czech should do wonders . . .
I don't think it's 'you' as much as the realization that everything else in terms of possible pairings has been tried by design or due to desperation from injuries.
Don't hurt yourself going out on that limb . . .
Only thing that concerns me-- more than usual-- was reading that Bylsma's adjustments have been implemented at WBS this year.
Good points. But knowing what we know about Shero, he can't be excited about our current defense. He's a defense first guy and while we have the prospect coming soon, I don't see why we can't parlay some of them into defenders who are more impact players now. I just don't love Orpik, Martin and Nisky rounding out our top 4. And with teams looking to be busy (so Dreger has speculated) on Sunday, I wouldn't be shocked if Shero's looking to acquire a top 4 defenseman.
A Boyle/Letang pairing would be nasty. He's got two years left on his contract. If SJ would be willing to eat part of it, I think we could give them a package of players they'd be interested in.
They absolutely could use a guy like TK. If Jeffrey is ready to go this season and can take on a 3C role, he'd fill a hole there as well. Add a top prospect and I think they'd consider it.
We already have enough D on the roster to fill out our top 4, 6, 7, etc. Let's see how they look over the first 20-30 games before even considering any moves.
I don't think people are giving Bortuzzo and Strait any respect here. I know they will probably never be top 4 D-men but they have been very good in the AHL. I only wish we had a full season for this experiment. With a short season teams can't afford too many rookie screw ups. I'm sure they will be on a short leash. At least we know they are in game shape. That's one advantage tey will have going in.
I don't know why we'd want any part of Dan Boyle. Good player, but he's past his prime and he's a non-physical type of D-man that we already have too much of. And he's another right defenseman. And he's expensive. And he's old.
I love the idea of Robyn Regehr, but if it's at the expense of Bortuzzo getting his shot I'd rather try what we already have.
Not as big of a fan of Hjalmarsson, but if Chicago is looking for a 2nd/3rd line center, Jeffrey is would be a decent part of that trade then. I am not sure what else they would want included in the deal to make it worthwhile.
Aside from the points that Jags, I and others have brought up about Boyle being past his prime and getting old, us trading TK (one of our most productive offensive forwards) and not getting one back in return would be a step backwards. I, too, would like to improve our defense; but even more than that, I'd like to improve our forwards. I don't like that move. Besides, SJ is also looking to compete this year, so they're not going to trade Boyle now.