These two things are mutually exclusive.
How? Based on his actual individual merit, Tom Wilson is a 3W. He adds very little to our top line in the offensive zone. Ovechkin and Kuznetsov's production decreases when he's on the ice. He makes up for that by being Tom Wilson -- doing the dirty work in deep and along the boards, forecheck/backcheck, best on the line in our own zone, etc.
He's great at those things, which is why every team would kill to have a Tom Wilson -- and the majority of them would play him on their third line. He's on our top line because...
1) It lets us spread our top-6 talent around to create 2 solid scoring lines.
2) It's a clever way to deploy him more often versus our opponents' best players, maximizing the Tom Wilson Effect, so to speak.
And my point is that, while both of those things are important, neither are carved in stone. Vrana, Burakovsky, Connolly, and maybe even Stephenson could all play that spot and provide more offensive punch and synergy with Ovechkin and Kuznetsov. And while maximizing the Tom Wilson Effect is certainly fun to watch, it's not always necessary and rarely game-breaking.
So again, I don't think he's got a stranglehold on the 1RW spot, and him being in that spot is 100% responsible for the uptick in his production this year. If he loses that spot, yes, he'll turn back into a 3rd-liner, and he'll be great at it.
It's his spot to lose and I like the fit as much as you guys do, but I'd rather not pay him 25% more based on points he drafted off two superstar linemates.