maroon 6
Registered User
Do you guys think he's a player that can benefit from a change of scenery or are there bigger issues? He doesn't seem like a Torts type of player and I remember Torts flipping out on him last year against the Canucks.
Do you guys think he's a player that can benefit from a change of scenery or are there bigger issues? He doesn't seem like a Torts type of player and I remember Torts flipping out on him last year against the Canucks.
In regards to the question from this summer if Wennberg could rebound into a 2 (or even 3) C, the verdict is in - no.
Find me a 20 point "PK specialist" making $5m annually.
Agreed on the buyout and would have agreed with it this past summer. Let's see what Stenlund can do in his place.
He's overpaid and a 4th line player here. He demonstrates basically no offense, but shows passing that tells you he has some skill. That will only happen with a change of scenery and a move from Torts as the two have bad chemistry - but all that comes with no guarantee.Do you guys think he's a player that can benefit from a change of scenery or are there bigger issues? He doesn't seem like a Torts type of player and I remember Torts flipping out on him last year against the Canucks.
For G-d's sake, hon. Do you have some kind of reminder to self in your calendar to bump this thread weekly or something? You've done it four or five times in a row now. Every Friday in December, even.Wennberg is now scoring points at a rate LESS than he did last season. With 10 points in 34 games, he's averaging .29 PPG. He was at .33 PPG (25 pts. in 75 GP) during his stellar previous season.
Nice job bringing him back, Jarmo!
For G-d's sake, hon. Do you have some kind of reminder to self in your calendar to bump this thread weekly or something? You've done it four or five times in a row now. Every Friday in December, even.
Most of the time I do. But I don't have a weekly reminder to self to bump the same thread about the same topic over and over.Ya know, sis. You could just let my posting go. You could let this thread go. You could let the fact that people are going to criticize Wennberg (a lot) go.
Most of the time I do. But I don't have a weekly reminder to self to bump the same thread about the same topic over and over.
With 6 even strength points in 34 games, Wennberg is tracking for 14 even strength points in 82 games.
I bet with those two early goals he thought he'd quieted his critics (and his coach) about needing to shoot more.
What is he, 0-5-5 in his last 25 games?
The only problem I have with this is that I detest Pooh so thoroughly, that I can't stand seeing his name on this board anymore.
Really glad to see Wenny step up with the absence of multiple regulars. 0-6-6 in his last 29 games.
Among the 326 NHL forwards who have played 300+ minutes at 5v5 this season, Wennberg ranks 295th in points per 60 minutes. Only Josh Anderson is worse on the Jackets. Wennberg has three primary points (goal, primary assist) at 5v5 this season.
He gets more “passenger assists” than anyone. I’ve watched all but one period in these games and remain unimpressed so I’ll not call it a comeback.....But on the bright side,Wennberg has 4 points in his last 4 games and 5 in his last 7. Don't call it a comeback...but he might hit 30 points just yet!
He gets more “passenger assists” than anyone. I’ve watched all but one period in these games and remain unimpressed so I’ll not call it a comeback.....But on the bright side,
at least he’s doubled Harrington’s goal total.
I wouldn't call last night's Stenlund goal a "passenger assist".He gets more “passenger assists” than anyone. I’ve watched all but one period in these games and remain unimpressed so I’ll not call it a comeback.....But on the bright side,
at least he’s doubled Harrington’s goal total.